Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Lewisham

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 23-011-137 Sector Transport And Highways Category Traffic Management Decided 23 April 2024

View Lewisham Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about speed cameras. This is because we cannot add to the investigation carried out by the Council or achieve the outcome that the complainant seeks. Also, there are other bodies better placed to deal with the issues raised.

The complaint

Mr X complains that the Council has failed to turn on speed cameras in its area. He says that vehicles are speeding on local roads and wants the Council to turn the cameras on.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide: we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X complained to the Council that speed cameras in its area were not switched on and that it was not enforcing speed restrictions in the area. The Council checked and found that the operation of the cameras in question was the responsibility of TfL. The Council said that it is the Police and not the Council that is responsible for enforcing speed restrictions.

I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. We could not add to the Council’s response or achieve the outcome he seeks as the Council are not responsible for the cameras or the enforcement of speed restrictions. The Police are better placed to deal with Mr X’s complaint that speed restrictions are not being enforced and TfL are better placed to consider his complaint about speed cameras that are not functioning.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we cannot add to the Council’s investigation or achieve the outcome he seeks and because other bodies are better placed to consider the issues he has raised.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Lewisham

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-008-753 Upheld
25-011-192 Upheld
25-018-847 Other
25-016-208 Other
25-004-042 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation