Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

City of London

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-011-778 Sector Children S Care Services Category Child Protection Decided 19 December 2022

View London scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s child protection action. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation.

The complaint

Ms X said the Council made an illegal use of s.47 of the Children Act 1989.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Councils with child protection duties must consider any safeguarding referral they receive. S.47 of the Children Act 1989 requires only that they find reason to suspect that a child may be at risk of serious harm or suffering actual harm. That is a deliberately low threshold that allows councils to take the action they deem necessary to protect a child, with or without parental consent, following a referral. That a council may later decide not to make a child subject to a child protection measures does not automatically mean its initial decisions were faulty.

Ms X provided a copy of the referral form used by the Council. What her child’s school reported was such that the Council’s initial decision that the child might be at risk of significant harm was a matter of professional judgement, not fault. It was not for the Council to seek to reach a definitive view before starting child protection enquiries. Its subsequent decision that child protection was not necessary was similarly a matter of professional judgement. That Ms X takes a different view of the Council’s actions does not mean the Council acted with fault.

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving City of London

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-012-605 28 Nov 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint that her car was damaged by a Council owned tree. This is … Other
25-000-783 18 Jul 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s recovery of business rates from Mr X. It was reasonable … Other
23-019-749 16 Jul 2024 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to the complainants reports of noise nuisance and damage … Other
21-017-542 22 Nov 2022 Summary: Mrs X complains about how the Council arranged social care funding for her mother Mrs Y. She said the … Not Upheld
22-004-954 14 Jul 2022 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s delays in progressing his Right to Buy application. This … Other
View all decisions for this organisation