Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Broadland District Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-010-264 Sector Environment And Regulation Category Antisocial Behaviour Decided 24 November 2022

View Broadland District Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s alleged failure to class noise Miss X complained about as a statutory nuisance. This is because we would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

The complaint

Miss X complained the Council failed to class noise made at a nearby school a statutory nuisance. She said this matter has caused her stress and inconvenience.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide: there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Miss X complained to the Council that noise and smoke coming from a nearby school was affecting her and should be deemed a statutory nuisance.

An officer from the Council visited the area and observed the school over several months. The officer noted occasional noise coming from the school but did not find evidence of a statutory nuisance. The officer spoke to the school and suggested changes it could make to resolve the situation.

Miss X remains unhappy and wants the Ombudsman to find the Council at fault for failing to class the noise and smoke she complained about a statutory nuisance. The Council conducted numerous visits and investigated Miss X’s complaint. The Council also spoke informally to the school and has not found evidence of a statutory nuisance. It is not the Ombudsman’s role to decide whether something constitutes a statutory nuisance, that is the Council’s role. There is no evidence of fault in the way the Council made its decision. The Ombudsman cannot question the merits of a decision which has been correctly made. The Ombudsman would therefore be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

Final decision

We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because we would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Broadland District Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-005-712 Not Upheld
24-021-619 Other
25-001-111 05 Jan 2026 Summary: Mrs X complained the Council failed to take enforcement action regarding alleged breaches of planning conditions in respect of … Upheld
25-003-411 19 Dec 2025 Summary: Mr X complained the Council wrongly confirmed a Tree Preservation Order. He said the Council did not follow the … Not Upheld
25-009-242 04 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her housing register application because there is … Other
View all decisions for this organisation