Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Horsham District Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-009-611 Sector Planning Category Planning Applications Decided 13 October 2022

View Horsham District Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the Complainant’s planning application. This is because the complainant had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mr X, has complained about how the Council dealt with his planning application. Mr X says the Council took too long to determine his application, requested unnecessary information and failed to provide guidance. Mr X says he has been caused considerable stress by the matter and incurred additional costs because of the Council’s actions.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b)) The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about: delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission a decision to refuse planning permission conditions placed on planning permission a planning enforcement notice.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X could have appealed to the Planning Inspector after eight weeks if he was unhappy with how long the Council was taking to determine his application. Mr X says the Council continuously asked for unnecessary information. But he could have refused to provide this and instead appealed to the Inspector for non-determination.

I consider it would have been reasonable for Mr X to have used his right to appeal and the Ombudsman will not usually investigate when someone had a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector, even if the appeal would not address all the issues complained about.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Horsham District Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-003-982 Not Upheld
25-016-055 Other
25-028-139 Other
25-019-365 Other
25-011-602 13 Jan 2026 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s administration of a community infrastructure levy charge. Mr X … Other
View all decisions for this organisation