Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Cumbria County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-009-004 Sector Transport And Highways Category Highway Repair And Maintenance Decided 12 October 2022

View Cumbria County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that his car was damaged when it hit a pothole, because it lies outside our jurisdiction. This is because it is a complaint about negligence which is a legal matter for the courts to consider and decide.

The complaint

The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains his car was damaged when it hit a pothole and the Council has denied his claim for damages.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended) The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X says his car was damaged when it hit a large pothole. The damage cost over £700 to repair. Mr X says the total costs he incurred due to the damage were over £1000.

Mr X submitted a claim for damages to the Council. The Council, via its insurers, has denied liability and refused the claim.

Mr X disagrees with the Council’s decision to refuse his claim.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction. This is because this is a complaint about negligence which is a legal matter for the courts to consider and decide. The Ombudsman cannot decide a negligence claim nor can it award damages. Only the courts can decide if the Council is liable for Mr X’s losses and if so whether to award the damages Mr X seeks. Mr X clearly considers the Council to be liable and it is reasonable to expect him to use his right to make a claim in the courts.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Cumbria County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
22-011-436 20 Dec 2022 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about faulty signals at a pedestrian crossing. This is because the issue has … Other
22-009-060 19 Dec 2022 Summary: Mrs X complains the Council delayed investigating her complaint at stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure. She … Upheld
22-008-363 19 Dec 2022 Summary: We found fault by the Council on Mrs J’s complaint about the appeal panel failing to follow procedure when … Upheld
22-012-105 02 Dec 2022 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage caused to Mr X’s fence allegedly arising from the Council’s actions … Other
21-009-380 21 Nov 2022 Summary: Mr C complained about the Council’s response to various highways matters which he says caused him avoidable distress and … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation