Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Manchester City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-006-887 Sector Benefits And Tax Category Council Tax Decided 11 September 2022

View Manchester City Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to take bankruptcy proceedings against Ms X for her unpaid council tax. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons for why Ms X could not have complained earlier.

The complaint

Ms X complains about the Council’s decision to take bankruptcy proceedings against her for unpaid council tax. She says the Council failed to apply appropriate discounts to her account which would have brought her below the threshold to start the proceedings. She says the Council’s actions caused her to lose her home.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Ms X acknowledges she failed to pay her council tax on time from 2011. Ms X has never applied for support with her Council tax or told the Council she was struggling to pay her council tax. The onus is on the individual to apply for any support they might be entitled to as councils cannot apply discounts, or provide support, if they are not aware of the individual’s circumstances.

The Council wrote to Ms X to advise her it was starting bankruptcy proceedings in November 2017. The Council said Ms X did not respond to any of its correspondence, so it had no choice but to proceed.

As Ms X knew she was not paying her Council tax liability when it fell due, it is reasonable to say she would have known, since 2011, she was accruing a debt. Further, the Council told Ms X of her debt and the bankruptcy action it was looking to take in 2017. If Ms X thought the Council was wrong to take bankruptcy action, or that the debt had been calculated incorrectly, it is reasonable for her to have complained in 2017, when she first became aware of the Council’s actions.

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is late and there are no good reasons for why Ms X could not have complained earlier.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Manchester City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-018-601 Other
25-014-709 Upheld
25-020-785 Upheld
25-002-304 Upheld
25-006-692 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation