Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

East Hertfordshire District Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-005-534 Sector Planning Category Planning Applications Decided 27 July 2022

View East Hertfordshire District Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the complainant’s planning application. This is because the complainant had the right to appeal to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mrs X, has complained about how the Council dealt with her planning application. She says the Council took too long to determine the application and it failed to properly communicate with her. Mrs X also disagreed with the changes the case officer said she should make to the plans for the development.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b)) The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about: delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission a decision to refuse planning permission conditions placed on planning permission a planning enforcement notice.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mrs X could have appealed to the Planning Inspector after eight weeks if she was unhappy with how long the Council was taking to determine her application. The Ombudsman will not usually investigate when someone had a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector, even if the appeal would not address all the issues complained about.

The plans for the development were amended on a few occasions before planning permission was granted. If Mrs X did not agree with the changes suggested by the case officer, she could have chosen not to amend the plans and appealed to the Planning Inspector if planning permission was then refused.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it would have been reasonable for her to have used her right of appeal to the Planning Inspector.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving East Hertfordshire District Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-021-563 Other
25-015-548 Other
25-016-787 Other
25-016-175 Other
25-015-573 Other
View all decisions for this organisation