Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

North Hertfordshire District Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 22-005-078 Sector Planning Category Other Decided 28 July 2022

View North Hertfordshire District Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with planning applications. This is because it is unlikely an investigation would add to the Council’s response and the complainant has not been caused any significant personal injustice.

The complaint

The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mr X, has complained the Council accepted comments on planning applications without an address being provided to verify the submissions.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide: any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or we could not add to any previous investigation by the council, or further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council’s policy says a person wishing to comment on a planning application should provide their name and address and anonymous comments will not be accepted. The Council accepts the policy was not followed in relation to the planning applications Mr X has referred to. It has apologised for the error and said it will ensure that names and addresses are provided in future.

I consider this a suitable remedy in the circumstances, and it is unlikely an investigation by the Ombudsman would add to this response or achieve anything further for Mr X. I also cannot say Mr X has been caused any significant personal injustice by the matter.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is unlikely an investigation by the Ombudsman could add to the Council’s response. Mr X has also not been caused any significant personal injustice by the matter.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving North Hertfordshire District Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-021-104 19 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s council tax reduction scheme. This is because we cannot achieve … Other
25-005-123 28 Sep 2025 Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the Council’s offers of unsuitable temporary accommodation and its … Other
24-009-344 24 Sep 2025 Summary: Mr X complained the Council initially did not allow him to join its housing register, then after letting him … Not Upheld
25-000-531 23 Sep 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a vehicle the Council removed and destroyed because it believed it to … Other
25-002-634 28 May 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the planning advice the Council provided to the complainant. This is because … Other
View all decisions for this organisation