Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Sevenoaks District Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-004-841 Sector Transport And Highways Category Rights Of Way Decided 18 July 2022

View Sevenoaks District Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to prevent vehicle access to a private lane which is a right of way. This complaint which was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner.

The complaint

Mr X complained about the Council’s failure to prevent a private lane from being used as a public highway when there are only limited vehicle rights. He says the Council discouraged the Police to carry out enforcement on the lane.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a @council/care provider has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X says the Council has failed to prevent cars from driving over a town centre lane which only has vehicle access rights for frontagers. He says the lane is only a public footpath and by not restricting vehicle use the Council is encouraging motorists to break the highway law and endanger pedestrians.

Mr X does not live in the area and there is no injustice to him. The owners of property on part of the lane made complaints about the matter to the Council as long ago as 2015 and took legal advice. The Council is not the highway authority and its role is limited to being owner of part of the lane where it joins the main street. The Council told the owners that it does not wish to place restrictions on its end of the lane because other owners have expressed a need to have access over its land.

The owners have been aware of the situation concerning access for a number of years and not submit his complaint within 12 months of when the matter came to their knowledge. There is no evidence to suggest that they could not have complained to us sooner.

Final decision

We will not investigate

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Sevenoaks District Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-007-699 09 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of … Other
25-009-849 18 Nov 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse or vary a Tree Preservation Order. … Other
25-006-543 27 Aug 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we … Other
24-014-534 30 Jul 2025 Summary: Mrs X complained the Council wrongly issued a prohibition order against her and her husband, which it later revoked, … Upheld
25-000-773 20 Jul 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with breaches of planning control. This is because … Other
View all decisions for this organisation