Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Ealing

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-004-020 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 28 June 2022

View Ealing Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that Mr X did not receive notification of a penalty charge notice. This is because there is a procedure in law that Mr X can use to remedy this, and it is reasonable to expect him to follow this process.

The complaint

Mr X complains he received no notification of a penalty charge notice (PCN); that the charge has increased, and this is causing him stress, made worse due to his ill health.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council has advised Mr X of how he can challenge the current enforcement of the PCN ie of his right to make a statutory declaration to the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) which is part of Northampton County Court. This is the procedure provided by Parliament for motorists to make such challenges and it is reasonable to expect Mr X to follow this process. As such, we will not investigate.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to us his right to make his case to the court at the TEC via a statutory declaration.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Ealing

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-027-539 Upheld
25-023-392 Other
25-007-774 Upheld
25-017-461 Other
25-005-970 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation