Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Leicester City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-003-819 Sector Housing Category Council House Sales And Leaseholders Decided 10 July 2022

View Leicester City Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s delay in the processing of a Right to Buy application because of a boundary problem. It would be reasonable for the complainant to follow the Notice of Delay procedure and to take the matter to court if necessary.

The complaint

Mrs X says the Council has delayed processing her council house purchase under the Right to Buy procedures.

Mrs X says she would like the Council to sort out the boundary lines, pay her back all the fees, costs, and compensation, reduce the price of the house as soon as possible so she can get a suitable mortgage, due to its failure to process the matter promptly.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Under the Housing Act 1985, Mrs X may serve an Initial Notice of Delay on the Council. The Council must either move the sale along or send a counter notice to Mrs X explaining what action it has taken or explain why it cannot progress the sale. The Council says a boundary problem would be a reason for it to serve a counter notice.

If the Council does not reply within a month the tenant can issue an Operative Notice of Delay’. Any rent the tenant pays after the Operative Notice would reduce the price of the property.

If the Council does not resolve the boundary problem to Mrs X’s satisfaction, or fails to act on a Notice of Delay, the law says Mrs X may ask the county court to resolve the dispute and decide what should happen. (Housing Act 1985, section 181) The law says it is for the county court to decide any matter in dispute in a Right to Buy transaction, and the cost of an application to it would be proportionate in a property purchase. It would therefore be reasonable for Mrs X to use the procedures set out in law to resolve her complaint.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it would reasonable for her to follow the Notice of Delay procedure and to take the matter to court if necessary.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Leicester City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-018-688 Other
25-019-715 Other
25-013-610 Other
25-015-497 Other
25-017-024 Other
View all decisions for this organisation