Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Westminster City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-002-734 Sector Housing Category Other Decided 05 June 2022

View Westminster Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We cannot investigate Ms B’s complaint that her property has been damaged due to the Council’s failure to maintain the adjoining Council-owned property. This is because we cannot investigate complaints about the management of social housing by councils.

The complaint

The complainant, who I will refer to as Ms B, complains that her home has been damaged due to the Council’s failure to maintain the adjoining property which is owned and managed by the Council. Ms B complains the Council has refused her claim for the costs she has incurred repairing her property and replacing damaged possessions.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

We cannot investigate complaints about the provision or management of social housing by a council acting as a registered social housing provider. (Local Government Act 1974, paragraph 5A schedule 5, as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Ms B.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Ms B’s complaint is about the Council’s management of one of its properties as a social landlord. We cannot investigate complaints about the management of social housing by councils. This means we have no discretion to investigate the issue Ms B complains about.

Final decision

We cannot investigate Ms B’s complaint because it is about the management of social housing by the council.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Westminster City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-008-007 Upheld
25-023-483 Other
25-022-063 Other
25-011-325 Other
25-008-803 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation