Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Somerset County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-002-105 Sector Education Category Special Educational Needs Decided 25 May 2022

View Somerset Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the contents of Y’s Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP). This is because it would be reasonable for Miss X to appeal against the contents of the EHCP to the SEND Tribunal.

The complaint

Miss X complains the Council has made an error in naming a school on her daughter Y’s, Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP). Miss X says the school cannot meet her needs. Miss X also complains the approach has not been child centred and that Y requires glasses which the Council will not fund, despite them being acknowledged as an educational need. Miss X would like the Council to name the school of her choice on the EHCP and add the therapy that professionals say Y requires to her EHCP.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council completed the EHCP in February 2022 after being ordered to undertake an assessment by the SEND Tribunal. The Council completed this assessment and decided not to issue an EHCP, but then conceded to issue an EHCP before another SEND Tribunal. The school named has confirmed it is unable to meet Y’s need. We cannot challenge the contents of an EHCP when they can be appealed against to the SEND Tribunal.

Final decision

We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it would be reasonable for her to appeal against the contents of the EHCP to the SEND Tribunal.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Somerset County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
22-008-013 21 Dec 2022 Summary: Mrs C complained about a series of delays connected to a review of her son’s Education, Health and Care … Upheld
22-011-546 15 Dec 2022 Summary: We will not investigate Mr C’s complaint about care and support provided to Mrs D before she died. This … Other
22-011-474 13 Dec 2022 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to take further action against a trader … Other
22-002-625 09 Dec 2022 Summary: Mrs X complained about the support the Council provided for her son, Y’s, special educational needs. There was fault … Upheld
22-001-565 30 Nov 2022 Summary: Ms C complains the Care Provider acting on behalf of the Council failed to provide acceptable care to her … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation