Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Hertfordshire County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-001-251 Sector Education Category Special Educational Needs Decided 12 May 2022

View Hertfordshire County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about naming the right school to meet Mr X’s child’s special educational needs. Mr X has used his right to appeal to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal about the school named by the Council.

The complaint

Mr X said the Council failed to name a specialist school on his child’s Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan despite having identified the child needed a specialist school in 2020.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended) The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The complaint concerns the naming of the correct school placement for Mr X’s child. The school named in an EHC Plan is a matter that carries the right of appeal to a SEND Tribunal. The method by which the Council reached its decision is not separable from the decision itself.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the matter complained of is not separable from the matter where Mr X has used his right to appeal to the SEND Tribunal.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Hertfordshire County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-008-173 Not Upheld
25-002-954 Upheld
25-007-340 Upheld
25-015-827 Other
25-013-302 Other
View all decisions for this organisation