Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Care UK Community Partnerships Limited

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-000-358 Sector Adult Care Services Category Residential Care Decided 09 May 2022

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about care provided to Mr X’s late mother, Ms Y. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Care Home’s actions.

The complaint

Mr X complained the care home (the Home) where his mother, Ms Y lived, failed to install bedrails or crashmats after she fell. He said Ms Y deteriorated mentally and physically whilst living at the Home. He wants a complete refund of Ms Y’s care fees as compensation for the care provided.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Care Provider.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Ms Y moved into the Home in August 2021. Between then and January 2022, she had five falls. Mr X complained to the Care Provider that the Home had not taken appropriate steps to assure her safety by installing bedrails or crashmats.

In the Care Provider’s complaint response, it confirmed it had spoken to Ms Y about the use of bedrails, but she declined. The Care Provider confirmed she had capacity to make that decision. It said it considered the use of crashmats but decided these were a potential trip hazard. It said it reviewed Ms Y’s risk assessment after each fall. In December, following three falls in short succession, it held a best interests meeting with Ms Y and her family where Ms Y agreed to the use of crash mats.

We will not investigate this complaint further. There is insufficient evidence of fault in how the Care Home has responded to Ms Y’s falls to justify investigating. In addition, whilst the Ombudsman can investigate complaints on behalf of a deceased person, we cannot provide a remedy to the individual for injustice caused by the alleged fault. Therefore, even if we did investigate and find evidence of fault, we could not now provide a remedy for any injustice caused.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Care Home’s actions.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Care UK Community Partnerships Limited

Reference Date Summary Outcome
24-012-889 01 Apr 2025 Summary: Ms X complained about poor care in a care home including about a failure to ensure she had all … Upheld
24-001-052 24 Oct 2024 Summary: Mrs X complained about the standard of care she received while staying at a care home. Mrs X said … Upheld
24-009-961 08 Oct 2024 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a Care Provider because it is better dealt with by the … Other
23-009-055 23 Sep 2024 Summary: Mr X complains that Chichester Grange Care Home failed to provide adequate care to his mother, Mrs Y. The … Upheld
23-016-919 01 Aug 2024 Summary: We upheld complaints about mouthcare and spectacles. The Care Provider accepted our recommendations to apologise and make changes to … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation