Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

North Yorkshire County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-000-217 Sector Transport And Highways Category Other Decided 09 May 2022

View North Yorkshire County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council liability for the regular flooding of Mr X’s property which takes place. This is because Mr X has a legal remedy against the Council which we would reasonably expect him to use and so places the complaint outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, says the Council is responsible for addressing the regular flooding of his property which arises when water flows off the highway due to inadequate drainage. He wants the Council to act to stop the flooding and to pay substantial compensation.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council, including its response to his complaint.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Since buying his new build property over 45 years ago, Mr X’s property has suffered from flooding once or twice a year.

He has approached the Council and its predecessor, the water company and the Environment Agency over the years but the problem has not been resolved.

In response to a recent complaint Mr X made to the Council, it explained that it could not help and that the most appropriate resolution to the problem continued to be direct contact with the water company.

While I understand Mr X’s frustration that flooding continues to affect his property, he has a legal remedy against the Council which we would reasonably expect him to use if he wants to challenge its legal position. As he has this alternative remedy available, the complaint falls outside our jurisdiction and will not be investigated.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he has a legal remedy against the Council which we would reasonably expect him to use and so places the complaint outside our jurisdiction.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving North Yorkshire County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
22-013-524 27 Mar 2024 Summary: Mrs X complains about the provision of care provided to her daughter Y, during various periods between 2019-2022. Mrs … Upheld
21-009-274 09 Dec 2022 Summary: the Council failed to provide adequate support between March 2020, when Mrs M’s daughter, G, stopped attending school regularly, … Upheld
22-010-527 24 Nov 2022 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council breached a licence agreement covering the impact of a highway … Other
22-004-578 24 Nov 2022 Summary: The Council failed to ensure Ms X’s daughter, Z, received the education in her April 2021 Education, Health and … Upheld
21-007-839 22 Nov 2022 Summary: The Council was at fault when it produced Mr X’s son’s Education, Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan) seven … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation