Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Winchester City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 22-000-184 Sector Transport And Highways Category Parking And Other Penalties Decided 28 April 2022

View Winchester and Eastleigh Healthcare NHS Trust scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about a penalty charge notice issued by the Council as Mr X has appealed to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a second penalty charge notice issued by the Council as the Council has cancelled the notice and it is unlikely we would recommend any further remedy.

The complaint

The complainant, Mr X, complains about two penalty charge notices (PCNs) issued by the Council. He says the matter left him feeling frustrated.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Traffic Penalty Tribunal considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for all areas of England outside London.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. We may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal but cannot investigate if the person has already appealed. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended) We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

I shared my draft decision with Mr X and took account of his comments.

My assessment

The Council issued Mr X two PCNs for parking contraventions when Mr X’s permit fell from his windscreen. Mr X challenged both PCNs with the Council and while it refused to cancel the first PCN (PCN 1) it agreed to cancel the second (PCN 2). Mr X then appealed against PCN 1 to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal and the Tribunal cancelled the PCN.

We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about PCN 1 as Mr X has used his right of appeal. While we retain discretion to investigate Mr X’s complaint about PCN 2 the Council’s cancellation of the PCN provides a suitable remedy for the issue and it is unlikely we would recommend anything more.

Final decision

We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about PCN 1 as Mr X has appealed to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about PCN 2 as the Council has provided a suitable remedy for the issue.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Winchester City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-013-592 Other
25-020-257 Other
25-010-366 07 Jan 2026 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council's assessment of his housing priority and his concerns of … Other
25-014-132 16 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because the … Other
24-022-012 18 May 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council considered a planning application. We have not seen … Other
View all decisions for this organisation