Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

London Borough of Brent

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 21-017-058 Sector Benefits And Tax Category Council Tax Decided 08 June 2022

View London Borough of Brent scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: Ms X complains the Council has not dealt with her Council Tax properly. The Council sent incorrect information to a different Council and did not tell Ms X she shouldn’t pay Council Tax. Ms X was wrongly charged Council Tax by the other Council. The Council has agreed to pay Ms X £200 and has made service improvements. It has also agreed to review letters when providing accommodation.

The complaint

The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Ms X, complains the Council has not dealt with her Council Tax correctly because: it has sent incorrect information to a second Council; and It did not tell her she should not have to pay Council Tax in temporary accommodation.

Ms X says she has had to pay Council Tax unnecessarily and has suffered distress.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused an injustice, we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended) If we are satisfied with an organisation’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and 34H(i), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I spoke to Ms X about his complaint and considered documents she provided. I made enquiries of the Council and considered its response and the supporting documents it provided.

Ms X and the organisation had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered any comments received before making a final decision.

What I found

What happened?

This is a brief chronology of key events. It does not contain everything I reviewed during my investigation.

Council 1 were responsible for providing Ms X with housing. Ms X lived in temporary accommodation provided by Council 1 between August 2014 and October 2016. The accommodation was within the area of Council 2, who were responsible for collecting Council Tax for the property.

In January 2018, Council 1 contacted Council 2 to clarify that Ms X had not been living in the property between October 2016 and January 2017 In 2021, Council 1 provided information to Council 2 about how long Ms X had been living in the property.

Ms X has been charged Council Tax by Council 2.

Analysis Incorrect information The Council agrees it sent incorrect information to Council 2 in 2021. It says this should not have happened and should have been resolved in 2018. This is fault by the Council. Ms X has been charged Council Tax and had to spend time and trouble dealing with circumstances which should not have recurred.

Council Tax liability There is no evidence that Council 1 informed Ms X that she should not need to pay Council Tax at the property when she moved there in 2014.

There is no evidence that Council 1 informed Council 2 that Ms X should not be liable for Council tax in 2014 when she moved there.

Emails from 2018, after Ms X moved out of the property, show that Council 1 told Council 2 about the correct dates Ms X had lived in the property and that she should not have been liable for Council Tax while she lived there.

This is fault by the Council. Ms X was wrongly charged Council Tax by Council 2 from 2014. Council 2 has now reviewed Ms X’s Council Tax account and will refund her any overpaid amount. Ms X has suffered distress as a result of the Council’s fault. Council 1 has apologised to Ms X for the inconvenience caused and offered to pay her £200. This is an appropriate partial remedy.

Action by the Council The Council has also identified necessary service improvements as a result of Ms X’s complaint, including: Providing advice to staff to check move out dates to avoid errors.

Agreed action

To remedy the outstanding injustice caused by the fault I have identified, the Council has agreed to take the following action within 4 weeks of this decision: Review correspondence sent out when providing temporary accommodation and consider incorporating a paragraph advising people of their Council Tax status in relation to their housing provision.

Final decision

I have found fault by the Council, which caused injustice to Ms X. I have now completed my investigation.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving London Borough of Brent

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-017-148 Other
25-018-624 Upheld
25-019-175 Other
25-004-662 Upheld
25-015-988 Other
View all decisions for this organisation