Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Westminster City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 21-015-613 Sector Education Category Special Educational Needs Decided 16 February 2022

View Westminster Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to assess Ms X’s child for an Education Health and Care Plan.

The complaint

Ms X said the Council has refused to assess her child for an Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan and cancelled a meeting about this.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended) The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council’s duty when receiving a request for an assessment of a child’s special educational needs (SEN) is to either agree to assess or to refuse and offer the child’s parent the right to appeal to the SEN Tribunal. I have seen the Council’s letter telling Ms X of her right to appeal.

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because she has a right to appeal to the SEND Tribunal it would be reasonable to use.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Westminster City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-008-007 Upheld
25-023-483 Other
25-022-063 Other
25-011-325 Other
25-008-803 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation