Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Staffordshire County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 21-015-311 Sector Children S Care Services Category Child Protection Decided 09 February 2022

View Staffordshire County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about safeguarding a child. Who will care for the child and have contact with him is a matter for a court, and the matters Mrs X complains of are or could form part of the court case.

The complaint

Mrs X said the Council failed to protect her great-grandson from harm and he suffered serious injuries. She said that despite a court deciding the parents were responsible, the Council is wrongly assessing them for contact.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended) The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The child’s care and residence has been or will be decided by a court. The matters about which Mrs X complains are likely to be or have been raised in court as they are integral to who can safely care for and see the child.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the matters complained of are not separable from those which have been or will be before a court.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Staffordshire County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-009-097 Upheld
25-017-395 Other
24-020-136 Upheld
25-005-668 Upheld
25-006-815 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation