Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

North Yorkshire County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld Reference 21-014-542 Sector Adult Care Services Category Charging Decided 07 February 2022

View North Yorkshire County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about the delay in receiving an overpayment for her late mother’s, Mrs C’s, care charges. This is because the Council has refunded the monies owed to the estate and there is no unremedied injustice warranting an Ombudsman investigation.

The complaint

Mrs B complained the Council sent an invoice for care after her late mother, Mrs C, had passed away, and she did not receive the refund of the overpayment for five months. Mrs B says she wants the Council to address all the points in her initial complaint to ensure mistakes do not happen again.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Council responded to Mrs B’s complaint in October. It said it was not notified that Mrs C had passed away until 22 September which is why she had received a further invoice for her care charges. It apologised and advised Mrs C’s account had been put on hold. It said Mrs B would be informed when the account had been recalculated.

The Council confirmed it had repaid Mrs C’s estate the overpayment of care charges £599.34 on 5 January 2022.

While Mrs B has not had all the answers she wants it is not the role of the Ombudsman to provide these. Although there was a delay in the estate receiving the refund, we are satisfied the Council has now repaid the overpayment, apologised to Mrs B for the distress caused from receiving a further invoice and explained the reasons for this.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because there is no unremedied injustice warranting an Ombudsman investigation.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving North Yorkshire County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
22-013-524 27 Mar 2024 Summary: Mrs X complains about the provision of care provided to her daughter Y, during various periods between 2019-2022. Mrs … Upheld
21-009-274 09 Dec 2022 Summary: the Council failed to provide adequate support between March 2020, when Mrs M’s daughter, G, stopped attending school regularly, … Upheld
22-004-578 24 Nov 2022 Summary: The Council failed to ensure Ms X’s daughter, Z, received the education in her April 2021 Education, Health and … Upheld
22-010-527 24 Nov 2022 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council breached a licence agreement covering the impact of a highway … Other
21-007-839 22 Nov 2022 Summary: The Council was at fault when it produced Mr X’s son’s Education, Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan) seven … Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation