Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Bristol City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 21-014-457 Sector Planning Category Enforcement Decided 01 February 2022

View Bristol City Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to take enforcement action. This is because the complainant could have appealed to the Planning Inspector.

The complaint

Mr X has complained on behalf of Mrs Y about the Council’s decision to take enforcement action. Mr X says the Council did not follow the proper process or take account of the relevant issues before issuing an enforcement notice. Mr X says Mrs Y has suffered financial losses and the Council’s actions have breached her Human Rights.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b)) The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about: delay – usually over eight weeks – by an authority in deciding an application for planning permission a decision to refuse planning permission conditions placed on planning permission a planning enforcement notice.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X has raised many concerns about the Council’s enforcement investigation and its decision to take enforcement action. However, Mrs Y could have appealed to the Planning Inspector if she disagreed with the notice. I consider it would have been reasonable for Mrs Y to have used her appeal right. The Ombudsman will not usually investigate when someone had a right to appeal to the Planning Inspector, even if the appeal would not address all the issues complained about.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint because it would have been reasonable for her to use her right to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Bristol City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-017-621 Other
25-015-924 Upheld
24-022-486 Not Upheld
25-016-336 Other
25-027-754 Other
View all decisions for this organisation