Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Staffordshire County Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 21-014-362 Sector Children S Care Services Category Child Protection Decided 25 January 2022

View Staffordshire County Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the safety of Miss X’s child. This matter is not separable from those considered by a court that decided where Miss X’s child should live. Only another court can change those arrangements and it would be reasonable for Miss X to return to court.

The complaint

Miss X said her ex-partner was abusive and she wanted her child removed from his care. She said a social worker had been taken in by him and this had affected what she told a court.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended) The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The complaint concerns the opinions the social worker formed and the evidence she gave to the court.

Final decision

We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint because the matters complained of are not separable from those that were before the court. Mis X has a right to return to court that it would be reasonable to use to seek new arrangements for her child.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Staffordshire County Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-009-097 Upheld
25-017-395 Other
24-020-136 Upheld
25-005-668 Upheld
25-006-815 Upheld
View all decisions for this organisation