Source · IMB Annual Report

Standford Hill

Year: 2024 Published: 29 Aug 2024 Type: Prison · Cat D Young Offender Institution Population: 461 Recommendations: 9 Key concerns Positive findings

The IMB finds HMP/YOI Standford Hill to be a well-led and well-run prison, demonstrating high standards in rehabilitation, education, training, and resettlement work, with good healthcare provision and very low rates of violence and self-harm. However, the Board is deeply concerned by the deteriorating condition of some buildings, the unsatisfactory performance of the maintenance provider GFSL, and the impact of early release schemes on the prison's core rehabilitative function. Further concerns include the lack of essential security scanning equipment and inadequate telephony for family contact.

Safety statistics

Incidents during reporting year
IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody0
Self-harm incidents0
Prisoner assaults0
Assaults on staff0

Positive findings

HMP/YOI Standford Hill is a well-led and well-run prison, providing an excellent example of how a rehabilitative prison can be run. It offers high-standard education, training, and resettlement work, resulting in over 100 prisoners leaving for paid work daily and good reoffending rates (8.06% over 2 years, 10.65% over 3 years). Healthcare and education provisions are good, with significant improvements in mental health support through a new neurodiversity support manager. The prison reports very low levels of violence, no suicides, self-harm, or deaths in custody during the reporting period. Staff morale is good, and relationships with prisoners are respectful.

Key concerns

9 items
Estate/Conditions The Board is unhappy with the condition of some of the buildings on the estate. Some show signs of subsidence and the response to deal with this has been, in our opinion, lamentably slow.
Estate/Conditions Repeated The Board is unhappy with the provider of maintenance on site, Gov Facility Services Limited (GSFL).
Regime/Time Out of Cell Fundamentally, our concern is that if the establishment becomes a holding prison for several prisoners prior to their release, this will diminish the effectiveness of the prison in its key objective of rehabilitation.
Safety Repeated The failure to install scanning equipment, as we have previously suggested, does not help with maintaining security within the prison, given the open nature of the site.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Telephony provision is poor and this is inconsistent with the need to enhance prisoners’ contact with their families, which is at the heart of what an open prison should do.
Healthcare It is, therefore, disappointing that non-attendance at booked appointments continues to occur.
Resettlement/Release Continuing focus needs to be put on prisoners finding their own work rather than relying on opportunities provided by the prison.
Estate/Conditions We are unhappy with the equipment in the laundry and funding for replacements is essential. There is also a persistent leak in the laundry roof, which is a concern as there is electrical machinery underneath and the risk of people working in the laundry slipping on the wet floors in bad weather.
Equality/Diversity The lack of Christian ministry is not acceptable, although we do accept that the prison has tried to find a suitable candidate.

Recommendations

9 items · 6 repeated
#RecommendationAddresseeStatus
1 While the Board understands the need for the early or additionally supervised release of prisoners, we are concerned that this can result in open prisons being under capacity and could diminish the rehabilitative role of the prison. The impact of this on the open estate needs to be considered. Repeated
Response
I fully understand the Board’s concern around population pressures and the impact this has on the open estate. On 12 July, the Lord Chancellor announced an interim measure to free up prison places by temporarily reducing the time those sentenced to Standard Determinate Sentences (SDS) will serve in prison from 50% to 40%. This measure, known as SDS40, will not apply to prisoners sentenced for most sexual offences and certain domestic-abuse related offences irrespective of length. It will also exclude serious violent offences with a sentence of four years or more. There are no easy or risk-free options given the challenges HM Prisons and Probation Service (HMPPS) is currently facing across both services and I appreciate the pressures that come with this. However, I am confident that once the SDS40 changes have been implemented, it will enable HMPPS to cease the use of End of Custody Supervised Licence (ECSL) and return to a period of stability. We also recognise that there is a likelihood SDS40 will have a considerable effect on the open estate with a large turnover of prisoners, particularly with the second tranche of releases later this October. I would like to reassure the Board that the Prison Group Director and his team will monitor and work closely to ensure prisoners are held in appropriate prisons in accordance with their categorisation as much as possible. The utilisation of spaces will be carefully monitored to ensure stability is maintained, with adjustments made to meet any new population needs whilst ensuring there is minimal impact on the delivery of services. We will assess the impact of these measures on the estate-wide population as time goes by. Our immediate focus is on the implementation of the SDS40 policy and work is ongoing across all probation regions to deliver the changes. These measures are being applied both prospectively and retrospectively to the current prison population to prevent us from reaching critical capacity and enable HMPPS to gain the headroom needed in the system. HMPPS will deliver SDS40 in a way that prioritises public safety and those released will be subject to strict probation supervision, and where necessary conditions like tagging and curfews, and they will be subject to return to prison if these conditions are breached. HMPPS is continuing to utilise the open estate as efficiently as possible in order to maximise usage across the whole of the prison estate.
Ministry of Justice In progress
2 The Board continues to be extremely dissatisfied with the performance of Government Facility Services Ltd (GFSL). When the service provider model is reviewed, it is essential that we do not see the same poor level of service under another name. Repeated
Response
It was regrettable to hear of the Board’s ongoing dissatisfaction around the performance of Gov Facilities Services Ltd (GFSL). GFSL Projects have continued to have issues with staffing and their suppliers, particularly the consultants carrying out the structural surveys. Whilst there are no doubts concerns exist around overall performance and management of facilities, I have been informed that locally the prison has a good working relationship with the GFSL Site Team and most issues have been resolved when raised. I understand the aging of the site also provides challenges to the local team based on their current resources. Local management are aware of the need to improve certain areas of the prison that falls within GFSL responsibility and will continue to closely monitor the progress of work required.
Ministry of Justice Noted
3 The performance of GFSL continues to be slow and unacceptable. Repeated
Response
It was regrettable to hear of the Board’s ongoing dissatisfaction around the performance of Gov Facilities Services Ltd (GFSL). GFSL Projects have continued to have issues with staffing and their suppliers, particularly the consultants carrying out the structural surveys. Whilst there are no doubts concerns exist around overall performance and management of facilities, I have been informed that locally the prison has a good working relationship with the GFSL Site Team and most issues have been resolved when raised. I understand the aging of the site also provides challenges to the local team based on their current resources. Local management are aware of the need to improve certain areas of the prison that falls within GFSL responsibility and will continue to closely monitor the progress of work required.
HMPPS Noted
4 The unsafe buildings within the Standford Hill estate need to be made safe and additional facilities made available. We consider the response to this possible health and safety situation so far to have been unacceptable and, indeed, too slow.
Response
Areas identified as having potential health and safety issues were the OMU and IMB offices. The OMU offices were immediately decanted and taken out of use. A survey of the IMB office was completed in September 2024 and a report is awaited before remedial action can be taken accordingly. The Salt Barn Building was also considered as being potentially dangerous in high winds. GFSL carried out their own risk assessment on this. Currently, there are no plans to refurbish HMP/YOI Standford Hill however, all requests from the establishment will be considered, noting that demands for maintenance are much greater than the available funding. Therefore, once a bid for a project is received, HMPPS has to prioritise works very carefully to make best use of that funding, focusing on risk to life and risk to capacity and decency.
HMPPS In progress
5 Scanning equipment needs to be installed to enhance the security of the site. Repeated
Response
The X-ray Body Scanner Policy Framework which governs the use of this technology is only applicable for the adult male closed estate. There are currently no plans or central funds to extend this to the open estate. Given open prisons have different risks of conveyance and several potential entry routes for illicit items to enter, it is unlikely that X-ray body scanners would be an effective solution. With regards to X-ray baggage scanners, a national contract is place if local investment is available and it is deemed necessary by the site. Local management are making an effort to secure an X-Ray machine to be installed in the reception area for use on property entering the site.
HMPPS Partial
6 Technological solutions to monitor prisoners when outside the prison should be investigated. Repeated
Response
HMPPS recognises that technology could play a useful role in streamlining the monitoring of individuals that are granted Release on Temporary Licence (ROTL). Further to last years’ response, HMPPS has now piloted the technology used to facilitate remote medical appointments. This was completed in December 2023 and an evaluation process is being conducted before determining whether this could be implemented more widely. Policy officials are working to explore what else could be done in this area. Locally, in addition to the pilot, HMP/YOI Standford Hill are exploring possibilities of purchasing geo-tagged photo technology from existing providers available within the private sector. The aim is to complete a pilot for this technology for use as a ROTL monitoring tool.
HMPPS In progress
7 We are unhappy with the equipment in the laundry and funding for replacements is essential.
Response
There have been issues obtaining funding for the Offender Management Unit (OMU) Portacabin and the laundry dryers. Funding has now been confirmed to replace four end-of-life tumble dryers and GFSL are awaiting quotes to conduct surveys on the leaking laundry roof. A start date to investigate and address possible subsidence to the OMU offices, Mclean House, and Quad Stores Building remains an outstanding issue. This is the same for the proposed extensive investigations/excavations of the swimming pool and gymnasium. A new Portacabin to house OMU staff is currently being tendered, and repairs to the Salt Barn roof/walls and scope of works have been agreed and are currently going through the tender process.
Governor / Director Accepted
8 As in previous years, we remain dissatisfied with the performance of GFSL. Repeated
Response
It was regrettable to hear of the Board’s ongoing dissatisfaction around the performance of Gov Facilities Services Ltd (GFSL). GFSL Projects have continued to have issues with staffing and their suppliers, particularly the consultants carrying out the structural surveys. Whilst there are no doubts concerns exist around overall performance and management of facilities, I have been informed that locally the prison has a good working relationship with the GFSL Site Team and most issues have been resolved when raised. I understand the aging of the site also provides challenges to the local team based on their current resources. Local management are aware of the need to improve certain areas of the prison that falls within GFSL responsibility and will continue to closely monitor the progress of work required.
Governor / Director Noted
9 The condition of some of the buildings on site is not good and additional funding needs to be obtained to ensure this is addressed.
Response
Areas identified as having potential health and safety issues were the OMU and IMB offices. The OMU offices were immediately decanted and taken out of use. A survey of the IMB office was completed in September 2024 and a report is awaited before remedial action can be taken accordingly. The Salt Barn Building was also considered as being potentially dangerous in high winds. GFSL carried out their own risk assessment on this. Currently, there are no plans to refurbish HMP/YOI Standford Hill however, all requests from the establishment will be considered, noting that demands for maintenance are much greater than the available funding. Therefore, once a bid for a project is received, HMPPS has to prioritise works very carefully to make best use of that funding, focusing on risk to life and risk to capacity and decency.
Governor / Director Noted

Applications to the IMB

CategoryCurrentPrevious
Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, ablutions 0 1
Canteen, facility list, catalogue(s) 0 3
Discipline, including adjudications, incentives schemes, sanctions 0 4
Equality 0 3
Finance, including pay, private monies, spends 2 8
Food and kitchens 1 5
Health, including physical, mental, social care 7 4
Letters, visits, telephones, public protection restrictions 0 2
Miscellaneous, including complaints system 6 3
Property during transfer or in another establishment or location 8 7
Property within this establishment 0 1
Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, library, regime, time out of cell 3 5
Sentence management, including HDC (home detention curfew), ROTL (release on temporary licence), parole, release dates, re-categorisation 2 8
Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying 1 4
Transfers 1 0

Related inspections & investigations

8 Oct 2024 HMIP · Unannounced Safety 4 · Respect 3 · Activity 4 · Release 4
28 Jun 2024 PPO fatal incident David Willis · Natural causes
PPO fatal incident Stuart Cordner
13 Jun 2022 PPO fatal incident Trowbridge, Mark · Natural causes
31 Oct 2020 PPO fatal incident Individual at Standford Hill · Natural causes
1 Jul 2019 PPO fatal incident Individual at Standford Hill · Natural causes

Other reports for Standford Hill

2025 Published 1 Oct 2025 Population 457 · Concerns
2023 Published 19 Sep 2023 Population 460 · Self-harm 0 · Concerns
2022 Published 27 Oct 2022 Population 499 · Concerns
2021 Published 12 Oct 2021 Population 458 · Concerns
2020 Published 25 Aug 2020 · Self-harm 2 · Concerns

Report details

Establishment
Standford Hill
Type
Prison · Cat D Young Offender Institution
Report year
2024
Published
29 August 2024
Responsible body
HMP Standford Hill
Recommendations
9
MoJ rating (2024/25)
4 — Outstanding

Population

Population461
Operational capacity464

Source links