Source · IMB Annual Report

Yarl’s Wood IRC

Year: 2024 Published: 5 Aug 2025 Type: IRC · Cat IRC Population: 388 Recommendations: 7 Key concerns Positive findings

Yarl's Wood IRC experienced a 40% increase in detainee throughput in 2024, operating close to its 444-person capacity. While staff are commended for humane treatment and effective incident management, concerns persist regarding high levels of violence, inappropriate detention of vulnerable individuals, and poor information sharing. The Board highlights issues with prolonged detention, slow casework progression, and the inappropriate use of the CSU for mental health cases, noting that staff recruitment and retention remain challenging.

Safety statistics

Incidents during reporting year
IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody0
Self-harm incidents5729
ACCT cases opened265181
Assaults on staff7
Use of force180140

Positive findings

Officers are commended for their efforts to diffuse altercations, engage in mediation, and effectively manage a major incident, demonstrating lessons learned from previous years. Staff generally treat detainees fairly and humanely, and the healthcare team is well-staffed, providing a range of health awareness sessions. The Board welcomes the increase in Detainee Engagement Team (DET) staff and notes improved mental health referral processes through NHFT. Positive changes include the replacement of 'HMP' labelled bags for detainee valuables and the organisation of cultural and social events to celebrate diversity.

Key concerns

22 items
Safety The levels of violence at Yarl’s Wood over the course of 2024 are similar to those in 2023. There have been many altercations between detained persons and there continues to be physical and verbal assaults on both female and male officers.
Safety The level of violence can be directly attributed to the proportion of the detained persons that are TSFNOs (Time Served Foreign National Offender), which has, at times, been more than 50% of the male population. There also continues to be a high level of stress and anger, particularly amongst the men, at the length of time they have been kept in detention. This in turn has contributed to the levels of violence, along with poor mental health.
Estate/Conditions The fragility of the centre’s fabric remains with potential risks resulting from such incidents.
Safety The Board has commented on a potential safeguarding exposure in having both male and female detained persons in the Care and Separation Unit (CSU) at the same time. It would be appropriate to have separate CSU accommodation for both males and females.
Safety The Detention Gatekeeper should be more robust in its safeguarding purpose of protecting vulnerable people from being detained.
Mental Health Information coming from prisons about the mental health and vulnerability of men being transferred to Yarl's Wood should be improved. There is poor information sharing that creates unnecessary risk in ensuring the safety and wellbeing of detained persons and increases the work for the staff, both Serco and healthcare.
Mental Health The CSU has been used to house detained persons with significant mental health problems, often for weeks at a time until a mental health bed has been found. The CSU is safer than other locations, but it is not an appropriate place for someone experiencing severe mental health problems.
Equality/Diversity There are still some complaints that the women receive unwelcome comments and cat calls from the men.
Safety Women have been unfairly threatened by officers with use of force if they refuse a transfer to the Derwentside IRC, when the transfer has been for administration purposes.
Mental Health Repeated The Board continues to be concerned about the number of persons detained with significant mental health problems. The Board is pleased to report that the responsibility for referral for specialist treatment has been assumed by NHFT, which should give improved management of the referral process. The Board notes that this is against a backdrop of a shortage of mental health beds generally.
Healthcare Healthcare is hindered in its work by detained persons arriving with a lack of medical history and who require treatment. Medication cannot be prescribed until their medical records are obtained or they are assessed by a GP.
Resettlement/Release Repeated The Board continues to be concerned about the length of time that detained persons, particularly TSFNOs, spend at the centre, leading to frustration and deterioration in their mental health.
Resettlement/Release Lack of information from case workers continues and the DET staff increase has not noticeably improved casework progression.
Resettlement/Release The Board regularly receives complaints from detained persons about the length of time it takes for bail accommodation to be approved with one man saying he had been waiting eight months.
Other The Board considers this practice demeaning and unfair.
Safety The Board has questioned Serco about this, and a Home Office instruction has been amended, leading to the use of handcuffs being the default position.
Food/Catering The Board does inspect and taste the food and considers the portions generous, albeit they can be stodgy.
Regime/Time Out of Cell The Board has seen the use of vapes indoors and noted that this is tolerated by some officers and enforced by others. To avoid any misunderstanding of policy by detained persons the Board recommends that there should be consistency in application of the policy by staff.
Mental Health Repeated The Board is surprised that these numbers are not more closely aligned.
Regime/Time Out of Cell The signal for mobile phones has been inconsistent throughout the year. When combined with occasional computer outages, this has been upsetting for detained persons who could not communicate with family and friends or pursue their cases.
Resettlement/Release It would appear that distance from family is not fully considered when persons are allocated to IRCs.
Regime/Time Out of Cell However, the Board does not consider that the CSU is suitable as pre-departure accommodation.

Recommendations

7 items · 3 repeated
#RecommendationAddresseeStatus
1 The Board repeats the recommendation to introduce a time limit for immigration detention. If no time limit is introduced, how does the Minister plan to ensure that the amount of time people are held in detention is decreased? Repeated
Response
There are currently no plans to introduce a time limit for immigration detention. A time limit on immigration detention would significantly impair our ability to remove those who have breached our immigration laws and refused to leave the UK voluntarily. It is likely to encourage and reward abuse, allowing those who wish to guarantee their release to frustrate the removal process until the time limit is reached. It would encourage late and opportunistic claims to be made simply to push a person over the time limit, regardless of the circumstances of their case. This would undermine our ability to maintain effective immigration control and potentially place the public at higher risk, in particular through the release of Foreign National Offenders (FNOs) into the community. The law does not permit individuals to be detained indefinitely. Our policies make clear that for detention to be lawful, that detention should be reasonable and for a specific statutory purpose, such as for examination or removal. The Home Office will seek to minimise detention times to ensure the timely return of those who have failed their claims or for FNOs who are set to be deported.
Other Rejected
2 The removal process for TSFNOs is started in prisons well before their sentence is due to end and in advance of their transfer from prison to the immigration estate. Repeated
Response
Through Operation Bornite, IE’s Foreign National Offender Returns Command (FNORC) has been testing an approach to commencing casework earlier in the FNO journey, focused on convicted FNOs awaiting sentencing who wish to return voluntarily. Operation Bornite has proved effective in increasing the time available to effect voluntary departures and, after the initial pilot phase concluded in December 2024, has now been expanded to all prisons.
Home Office In progress
3 The length of stay is reduced by improving the processes related to asylum status/and or removal. Repeated
Response
In addition to Operation Bornite noted above at recommendation two, and as part of the asylum, returns and enforcement programme, NRPC have reviewed and assessed Detained Asylum Casework (DAC) processes, introducing efficiencies to the current model with the aim to reduce the length of stay in detention.
Home Office In progress
4 The process for voluntary returns should be improved/rationalised so that those who wish to leave, do so more quickly.
Response
The process for voluntary returns is under continual review however not all detained individuals are suitable for voluntary return. When individuals are detained for removal, a voluntary departure can still be arranged for most cases. Where individuals indicate a desire to purchase their own ticket while in detention, we will look to consider the request favourably. Individuals leaving voluntarily will benefit from a reduced entry ban and they are more likely to comply with the departure, resulting in less failed removals, less last-minute barriers, and less requirement for escorts. However, there are limits on the airlines we can utilise, as well as the number of passengers we can place on each flight. This means that there may be some delays in arranging suitable flights even when individuals are keen to depart. In addition, from 19 June 2025, a 12-week pilot commenced where all detained non-FNOs are offered the opportunity to voluntarily depart to their home country with financial support. The pilot will assess whether there are benefits to offering a financially supported voluntary return scheme (VRS) within immigration detention, with the aim of achieving increased compliance and facilitating removal at an earlier point for those who are eligible. Currently, detained persons are excluded from making an application via the VRS for a financially supported return, with other schemes available for foreign national offenders who are serving a custodial sentence in prison, and general support made available for all residents in our Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs) who wish to depart voluntarily. As mentioned at recommendation two Operation Bornite has proved effective in increasing the time available to effect voluntary departures and, after the initial pilot phase concluded in December 2024, has now been expanded to all prisons. Detention Engagement Teams are working closely with case working colleagues to ensure that those seeking to make a voluntary return have their return quickly facilitated. DET managers have now established a dedicated Teams channel with FNO RC colleagues to raise any voluntary departure cases which require escalation.
Home Office In progress
5 The Detention Gatekeeper should be more robust in its safeguarding purpose of protecting vulnerable people from being detained
Response
The role of the Detention Gatekeeper (DGK) is to consistently apply the Detention: General Instructions, and Adults at Risk (AaR) in immigration detention policy (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/adults-at-risk-in-immigration-detention) so that detention only takes place where there is a realistic prospect of return within a reasonable timescale. Where vulnerabilities are identified, the presumption of liberty is strengthened for that individual, and the appropriateness of detention is balanced against any immigration control and public-protection considerations on a case-by-case basis. The Adults at Risk policy does not exempt vulnerable people from the possibility of detention, however vulnerable individuals will only be detained under immigration powers where those immigration control considerations or public-protection factors outweigh any risk factors in their case. In addition, mental vulnerability and immigration detention non-clinical guidance was published in July 2020 (reissued July 2023). This guidance looks to ensure that appropriate support is offered to: those who lack decision making capacity, those with disability arising from mental impairment and those who have a mental health condition; and that, for those with a disability, adjustments are made to support the individual whilst in immigration detention. All individuals have ready access to healthcare throughout their detention and can make an appointment with the healthcare team at any point - ensuring access to medical professionals and levels of primary care in line with that available in the community. There are also established procedures in place in every IRC to manage vulnerable individuals including those with mental health concerns, with formal risk assessments undertaken on initial detention and additional systems for raising concerns at any subsequent point
Home Office Rejected
6 There have been logistical issues when the CSU unit has been needed to be used by both male and female detained persons. The Board recommends that to avoid such problems, there should be a separate dedicated CSU for female detained persons.
Response
The Home Office are working with Serco to consider feasibility options for a specific CSU on Nightingale Unit.
Governor / Director Partial
7 To encourage external acute psychiatric services to remove psychiatrically ill patients at an early stage.
Response
NHS England Commissioners work closely with the healthcare provider at the site, to encourage and support close collaboration with Specialist Commissioning Teams and local Integrated Care Boards (ICB) to ensure (where clinically appropriate) that those in our care gain access to mental health beds in as timely and efficient a manner as possible. With the current re-organisation of NHSE, this will lead to greater integration and collaboration between commissioners and ICBs – in turn this will lead to closer working relationships with acute psychiatric services, ensuring transfer to hospitals are done at an earliest stage as is possible.
NHS / Healthcare Provider In progress

Applications to the IMB

CategoryCurrentPrevious
Accommodation including laundry, showers 1 3
Equality 0 0
Escorts 2 0
Finance including detained persons centre accounts 0 0
Food and kitchens 0 0
Health including physical, mental, social care 0 2
Issues relating to detained persons immigration case, including access to legal advice 8 20
Letters, faxes, visits, phones, internet access 0 0
Other 3 5
Property during transfer or in another establishment or location 2 2
Property within centre 0 0
Purposeful activity including education, paid work, training, library, other activities 0 0
Staff/detained persons conduct, including bullying 4 3
Use of force, removal from association 2 0

Other reports for Yarl’s Wood IRC

2023 Published 17 Oct 2024 Population 310 · Self-harm 29 · Concerns

Report details

Establishment
Yarl’s Wood IRC
Type
IRC · Cat IRC
Report year
2024
Published
5 August 2025
Responsible body
Yarl’s Wood IRC
Recommendations
7

Population

Population388
Operational capacity444
Time out of cell10.0h/day

Service providers

Healthcare
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (NHFT)
Management
Serco

Source links