Source · IMB Annual Report

Charter Flight Monitoring Team (CFMT)

AI-generated report summary The Independent Monitoring Board's Charter Flight Monitoring Team (CFMT) observed 12 charter operations during the reporting year, highlighting ongoing concerns about the treatment of individuals removed from the UK. Key issues include the removal of vulnerable people, the inhumane duration of in-vehicle confinement for returnees, and an increase in the use of restraint. The Board also noted improvements in interpreter provision and escort interactions but raised alarms about medical confidentiality and the reliability of interpretation assessments.

Year: 2024 Published: 4 Sep 2025 Type: Prison · Cat IRC Charter Flight Monitoring Team Recommendations: 7 Key concerns Positive findings

Safety statistics

Incidents during reporting year
IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Use of force17

Positive findings

AI-generated summary
The Board noted improved provision of professional interpreters and consistently observed escorts' friendly and respectful approach towards returnees. There were positive decisions not to proceed with removals due to health concerns, and the standard of coach driving improved. Escorts ensured returnees were suitably dressed for travel and provided clothes when needed. There was also evidence of good forward planning for medication.

Key concerns

10 items
Safety Repeated HOIE continued to remove people with known vulnerabilities, whether around their mental health or their risk of harming themselves.
Safety There was an increase in the use of restraint on returnees.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Repeated The impact on returnees of night operations and road journeys to airports, during which they were held in vehicles for hours, needs continued scrutiny.
Equality/Diversity Repeated The processes used to identify interpretation needs are unreliable and should be improved. Consideration should be given to having translators on all operations, including ones where it might be considered most of the returnees might speak English.
Mental Health Repeated Last year the CFMT raised concerns around the removal of a man in the summer directly from a psychiatric unit. A similar removal took place this reporting year. Despite the IMB receiving legal advice that direction orders were not correctly signed off, the Home Office are consulting their own lawyers and that advice, at time of writing this report, is still not available.
Safety Repeated In the Board’s view, the risk assessments should be written in such a way to ensure clarity, avoiding, for example, too many acronyms. This would mean that the document could be easily understood by escorting staff and observers.
Safety Repeated We, again, noted discrepancies between relevant reports on timings and WRB positions, casting doubt on the reliability of these records.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Repeated Inadequate and unsanitary toilet facilities on coaches, including lack of privacy and hot water, and the demeaning use of disposable urine bags in vans. Source wording under review
Healthcare Repeated For most of the year the paramedics returned medication and medical notes to their owners towards the end of the flight. Last year we reported that returnees’ prescribed medication was handed over, en masse, to the Albanian receiving authorities, seemingly at their request. We continue to consider these handovers of medical documents and medication to be a potential, if not actual, breach of medical confidentiality, and there was no guarantee, as far as we were aware, that they would be restored to their rightful owners.
Complaints/Property The use of single aisle aircraft presents a challenge to both the Chief Immigration Officer (CIO, an Immigration Enforcement representative who travels on flights) and the returnees wishing to speak with the CIO. On occasion, the CIO is unable to talk to everyone because aisles are blocked for (flight) operational reasons. Consideration should be given as to how the CIO’s ‘surgery’ could best be carried out so that all returnees are given an opportunity to meet with the CIO.

Recommendations

7 items · 6 repeated

Recommendation 1

Addressee: Home Office

It is neither fair nor humane to subject people being removed from the country: • to a process for their delivery to the airport, which always takes place through the night, to meet an arrival timetable HOIE has agreed with the overseas authorities and • (as part of this process) to hours of confinement in vehicles to reach departure airports selected by HOIE. A fairer and more humane approach should be adopted.

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
The scheduling of charter flight departures must account for various considerations, including the preferred arrival times stipulated by receiving countries. These preferences are shaped by factors such as the need to avoid peak arrival periods and to ensure the availability of adequate official and support staff for efficient processing upon landing. Morning arrivals offer particular advantages, as they facilitate onward travel during daylight hours for those being returned. To enhance delivery reliability, we operate from multiple airports to reduce risk and avoid dependence on a single location. We regularly review our airport portfolio and engage with new airport operators whenever better options emerge for charter operations, considering factors like proximity to IRCs and optimal operating conditions. Immigration Enforcement strives to take a fair and humane approach, coupled with balancing the wellbeing, welfare and safety to return those who have no lawful right to remain in the United Kingdom and Foreign National Offenders who have committed criminal offences.

Recorded status: Rejected

Topic: Regime

Recommendation 2

Addressee: Home Office

The processes used to identify interpretation needs are unreliable and should be improved. Consideration should be given to having translators on all operations, including ones where it might be considered most of the returnees might speak English.

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
The requirement for interpreting assistance is communicated to Returns Logisitic (RL) Charters by the case owner when an individual case is referred for charter removal. This need is determined using information from Home Office systems and prior interactions with the individuals being returned. After an individual has been inducted at an IRC, staff are expected to notify RL Charters if an interpreting need is identified during induction that was not previously flagged, or to withdraw the request if the induction determines that the individual's English proficiency is sufficient for the removal process. Following the CFMT IMB 2024 annual report, the Home Office agreed to take steps to improve interpreter services on charter flights. Since September 2025 more interpreters are be requested for charter flight operations, with the objective of having an interpreter at each IRC and STHF where individuals being returned are collected for a flight. Interpreters are not civil servants directly employed by the Home Office and therefore have the autonomy to select assignments according to their preference. Charter work is generally less favoured among interpreters due to its extended and often irregular hours, as well as required travel. To encourage participation in charter flight assignments, interpreters receive an additional fixed payment on top of standard fees.

Recorded status: Rejected

Topic: Equality

Recommendation 3

Addressee: Home Office

In the Board’s view, the risk assessments should be written in such a way to ensure clarity, avoiding, for example, too many acronyms. This would mean that the document could be easily understood by escorting staff and observers.

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
The board was asked to clarify which risk assessments the recommendation applied to and confirmed that it pertains to assessments given to escorts involved in the operation. Escorting staff are trained to understand risk assessments and our contracted service provider have confirmed that there have been no issues identified with understanding acronyms. Observers seeking additional information regarding risk assessments during operations are advised to consult the coach commander for further clarification.

Recorded status: Rejected

Topic: Safety

Recommendation 4

Addressee: Home Office

The use of single aisle aircraft presents a challenge to both the Chief Immigration Officer (CIO, an Immigration Enforcement representative who travels on flights) and the returnees wishing to speak with the CIO. On occasion, the CIO is unable to talk to everyone because aisles are blocked for (flight) operational reasons. Consideration should be given as to how the CIO’s ‘surgery’ could best be carried out so that all returnees are given an opportunity to meet with the CIO.

Source text verified

Government response
The type of aircraft selected for Home Office short haul charter flights is regularly reviewed to ensure it meets the current level/rate of returns required by the department. Currently this need is met using single aisle aircraft for these flights. There is a significant price increase between single and twin aisle aircraft, therefore making best use of public funds when procuring these aircraft is another factor taken into consideration. Furthermore, due to ongoing construction work on the infrastructure at Tirana airport, twin aisle aircraft are unable to operate into the airport which currently prevents the use of these aircraft for this destination.

Recorded status: Rejected

Topic: Complaints

Recommendation 5

Addressee: Home Office

The length of time returnees are held in coaches, before the road journey to the selected airport even begins, is another long-standing concern of the CFMT. These long periods of confinement have continued and should be reduced.

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
Reducing coach waiting times remains operationally challenging due to the geographic locations of our centres and departure airports. We acknowledge the impact extended waiting times can have on individual wellbeing and take steps to mitigate this by providing recreational packs to all people being returned. To further reduce delays and in response to this recommendation in previous reports, we implemented the deployment of advance parties to prepare documentation and property ahead of time, helping to streamline the collection process. Additionally, we have developed a tracking process to monitor coach waiting times, identify trends, and investigate any outliers, whether particularly long or unusually short to continuously improve our procedures.

Recorded status: Rejected

Topic: Regime

Recommendation 6

Addressee: Other — other

The plan given in response to our previous annual reports, detailing the various steps escorts would take to achieve interpreting support for returnees when a professional interpreter was not present, has been achieved to only a limited extent. The plan was impressive, but it needs to be fully delivered.

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
In response to feedback from Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs), the Home Office identifies the requirement to provide interpreters for charter operations. Where an interpreter is not available, Escorting Officers must follow the steps outlined below to ensure effective communication: 1. Contact Big Word – Attempt to secure an interpreter via the Big Word service. 2. Phone Interpretation via Another Coach Commander – If Big Word is unavailable, contact another Coach Commander who has access to an interpreter and request telephone translation assistance. 3. Use a Translation App – If no interpreter is available via phone, use our trusted translation app to facilitate communication. 4. Utilise Bilingual Escorting Officers – Only as a last resort, an Escorting Officer who speaks the required language may provide interpretation support. We acknowledge the importance of clear communication and continue to work on improving this process to ensure dignity, understanding, and compliance throughout the operation.

Recorded status: Accepted

Topic: Equality

Recommendation 7

Addressee: Other — other

We recommend that further discussions take place with IRCs about locating suitable areas where – once they have gone through the induction process – returnees can be held before boarding a coach.

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
We previously reviewed this option following site visits and discussions with staff at Colnbrook, Harmondsworth, Brook House, and Tinsley House IRCs. At the time, due to a range of identified risk factors, the option was not pursued further.

Recorded status: Rejected

Topic: Regime

Other reports for Charter Flight Monitoring Team (CFMT)

2023 Published 25 Jul 2024 · Self-harm 3 · Concerns
2021 Published 24 Jun 2022 · Concerns