Source · IMB Annual Report
Ashfield
Year: 2020
Published: 28 Oct 2020
Type: Prison · Cat C
Population: 400
Recommendations: 6
Key concerns
Positive findings
HMP Ashfield continues to be a well-run Category C prison for men serving sentences for sexual offences, known for its safe environment and humane treatment. Despite the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily regime and programme delivery, staff were highly commended for their support and resilience. Key concerns include the persistent lack of suitable accommodation for release, issues with property management from other establishments, and the growing backlog for intervention programmes due to COVID-19 restrictions, which could hinder prisoner progression and parole.
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 3 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 68 | 56 |
| ACCT cases opened | 100 | 86 |
| Prisoner assaults | 4 | 5 |
| Assaults on staff | 0 | 1 |
| Use of force | 9 | 19 |
| Drug finds | 66 | — |
Positive findings
HMP Ashfield continues to be a particularly well-run prison, delivering a safe environment with humane treatment. The Director, managers, residential officers, and chaplaincy staff are highly commended for maintaining high standards and supporting prisoners, especially during lockdown. The prison has low levels of violence, effective ACCT processes, and high standards of accommodation and catering. Property management is good, and the gym and library have seen major upgrades. The increase in category D places and the successful Ashfest arts festival are also positive developments.
Key concerns
Resettlement/Release
Repeated
Lack of suitable accommodation for men convicted of sexual offences, particularly approved premises.
Mental Health
Adverse impact on prisoners' wellbeing if HMPPS COVID-19 restrictions continue for a prolonged period.
Education/Purposeful Activity
Significant impact of COVID-19 restrictions on the delivery of intervention programmes, potentially affecting parole and release due to increased backlogs.
Complaints/Property
Missing property in former establishments continues to be one of the top causes for complaint by prisoners.
Resettlement/Release
Repeated
The issue of prisoners arriving at Ashfield with incomplete or inappropriate contact arrangements from their previous establishments has continued – and, in fact, worsened.
Regime/Time Out of Cell
Plans for the progression wing have not been advanced enough, to encourage greater independence and prepare prisoners for the next stage of their sentence.
Food/Catering
Repeated
Lack of diabetic items available from the prison shop.
Equality/Diversity
Repeated
Irregular attendance of nominated senior managers at the meetings held by the different forums (for protected characteristics).
Equality/Diversity
Repeated
Frequency of diversity and equality action team meetings had been reduced to quarterly and there was little evidence of any in-depth analysis of the numerous statistics presented to meetings.
Resettlement/Release
Repeated
Absence of workshops (providing advice on approved premises, open prisons, and so on).
Recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Addressee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Can the lack of availability of appropriate accommodation for men convicted of sexual offences be raised with the minister for housing, communities and local government?
Repeated
Response
I understand the Board’s repeated concern about the housing needs of offenders on release from prison. It is widely understood that offenders can face significant barriers to securing suitable accommodation due to pressure on social housing, difficulties in accessing the private rented sector and the availability of support to help with life skills. In addition to the general barriers faced by offenders, those convicted of a sexual offence are more likely to experience additional challenges. HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) is firmly committed to working effectively with a wide range of commissioners, stakeholders and partners to influence strategy, promote access to services and address the housing needs of offenders. At a national level we are working closely with the Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government and we know that across England and Wales prisons and probation work closely with local partners, including Local Housing Authorities (LHA). The Homelessness Reduction Act 2017 has significantly reformed England’s homelessness legislation by placing duties on LHAs to intervene at earlier stages to prevent homelessness in their areas. As part of this, LHAs are required to ensure advisory services are designed to meet the specific needs of vulnerable groups, including persons released from prison. The prison and probation providers are subject to the ‘Duty to Refer’ and have a statutory responsibility, under the Homelessness Reduction Act to refer anyone at risk of homelessness to the LHA 56 days before they are due to become homeless. |
Other | In progress |
| 2 |
When will plans for increased places in approved premises be realised?
Repeated
Response
We are continuing to work towards achieving the commitment to 200 additional Approved Premises (AP) bed placements. These additional bed spaces will support the increasing number of referrals into the AP estate. An AP expansion board has set up a strategic business case seeking funds to support the proposed expansion. To date 47 additional bed spaces have been delivered and planning permission has been approved for an additional 26 bed female AP in the South West and a 4 bed expansion in London. The expansion programme has been reviewed to accommodate Covid-19 related issues and is now expected to be complete by March 2024. |
Ministry of Justice | In progress |
| 3 |
Are there plans for all HMPPS establishments to move to electronic property management systems? This would greatly facilitate transfer between establishments.
Response
While digital improvements are being explored, the nature of that work means that any digital changes are likely to take longer to develop. As noted in the Board’s report, the new electronic property recording system in operation at HMP Ashfield is working well. The system provides a live electronic record of property held in possession and stored. A new cell clearance form automatically provides a list of a prisoner’s property to be checked if staff need to clear a prisoner’s cell. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 4 |
What more can be done to improve the management of property, to reduce the volume of lost property? The cost in resources in following up complaints often far exceeds the value of the items.
Response
It is unfortunate and regrettable that prisoners’ property continues to be an issue. The development of the new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework is being informed by a project which was undertaken in summer 2019, involving stakeholders across HMPPS and the escort services. The project involved visiting 14 prisons, consultation with staff and prisoners, and engagement with external stakeholders such as the Independent Monitoring Board Secretariat and Prisons and Probation Ombudsman. Its purpose was to support the policy review and identify areas where immediate and more long-term changes may be required to improve operational practice. Following the conclusion of the project, HMPPS has worked closely with stakeholders to consult on proposed changes to the policy. Discussions ahead of consultation with IMB members began with the IMB Secretariat in late February 2020, who proposed meetings take place with Board members in April. In light of the pressures placed on Boards by Covid-19, HMPPS agreed with the IMB Secretariat to pause this consultation. This work is now moving forward again and a meeting with IMB members took place in August. Consultation with operational colleagues is also expected to resume soon. The feedback received at the meeting with IMB members will be considered alongside the comments received from other stakeholders, with the intention that the revised draft policy framework will be circulated for wider consultation at the end of 2020. While digital improvements are being explored, the nature of that work means that any digital changes are likely to take longer to develop. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 5 |
What more can be done to ensure that other prisons conduct accurate and robust assessments of contact arrangements?
Repeated
Response
Further to the response to the Board of 3 June 2020, the Offender Management in Custody (OMiC) model now mandates a Prison Offender Manager (POM) handover meeting following a prisoner’s transfer to a new establishment. The aim of this handover, as with other handovers, is to transfer information to the new POM, so that progress against the sentence plan can progress seamlessly. Using the ‘Manage POM Cases Service’ POMs can see the case allocation history, including the contact details of who has previously managed the prisoner in another prison. Details relating to all public protection matters, including Persons Posing a Risk to Children (PPRC) provisions must be shared as referenced in the ‘OMiC POM to POM Handover Checklist’ available on EQuiP. Establishments are encouraged to liaise with sending establishments when there are inconsistencies over previous risk assessments. Any common themes or risk concerns are shared with the HMPPS Prison Public Protection Lead who can offer additional guidance, support and intervention where necessary. HMP Ashfield has not raised any concerns with the HMPPS Prison Public Protection Lead about ongoing problems with missing PPRC or Child Contact assessments, but this avenue is open to them should they wish. A non-public facing Prison Public Protection website was launched in July 2020 and no other establishments have raised problems associated with missing PPRC or Child Contact assessments. |
HMPPS | Implemented |
| 6 | Can plans for the progression wing be advanced, to encourage greater independence and prepare prisoners for the next stage of their sentence? | Governor / Director |
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 45 | 38 |
| Chaplaincy and faith | 0 | 0 |
| Discipline (including adjudications) | 1 | 1 |
| Equality and diversity | 0 | 0 |
| Finance/pay | 0 | 0 |
| Food | 0 | 0 |
| Grand total | 68 | 78 |
| Healthcare | 2 | 0 |
| Legal | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 7 | 10 |
| Privileges/IEP | 0 | 0 |
| Property | 8 | 23 |
| Regime (including time out of cell) | 0 | 1 |
| Staff conduct | 2 | 3 |
| Total (excluding ‘other’) | 61 | 68 |
| Visits | 0 | 0 |
| Work/education/vocational training | 3 | 2 |
Related inspections & investigations
9 Oct 2023
HMIP · Unannounced
Safety 4
· Respect 4
· Activity 1
· Release 4
Other reports for Ashfield
Report details
- Establishment
- Ashfield
- Type
- Prison · Cat C
- Report year
- 2020
- Published
- 28 October 2020
- Responsible body
- HMP Ashfield
- Recommendations
- 6
- MoJ rating (2024/25)
- 3 — Good
Population
| Population | 400 |
| Operational capacity | 412 |
| CNA (designed for) | 416 96% |
| Time out of cell | 10.0h/day |
Service providers
Adult social care
South Gloucestershire Social Services
Coaching
Coaching Inside and Out
Dentistry
Time for Teeth
Healthcare
Avon and Wiltshire Partnership (AWP) Mental Health Trust
Voluntary services
Shannon Trust