Source · Scotland · Fatal Accident Inquiry

Mohammed Tasleen Iqbal

Scotland · FAI Reference: FAI-MOHAMMED-TASLEEN-IQBAL Published: 20 Sep 2001 Sheriff: Sheriff T.A.K. Drummond Sheriffdom: Lothian and Borders View PDF
Court recommendations Identified
Responses identified 0
8-week deadline 15 Nov 2001
Section 28 status Response pending

Recommendations

Recommendations. In the light of the evidence which emerged in the course of this Inquiry I was invited to make a number of recommendations: I do not make certain of those recommendations because, in my opinion, they went further than was appropriate for the scope of a Fatal Accident Inquiry and impinged on wider issues relating to the conduct of the recreational diving industry as a whole. I now set out the recommendations which I considered it appropriate to make but I have set out at length in this note the full text of those other recommendations in order that those involved in recreational diving should be aware of the issues raised in the Inquiry. My recommendations are :- • that regular checks to identify known potential defects in the operation of pressure gauges should be carried out at regular intervals and that the carrying out of such checks should be documented in appropriate service records . • that persons or organisations involved in the hiring of diving equipment should carry out checks on regulators prior to every transaction of hiring out to ensure that inhalation resistance pressures and all parts of regulators capable of adjustment are within manufacturers specifications before being issued for hire : that the fact of such checks , the result , the date on which they were carried out and the identity of the person carrying out the check should be recorded in appropriate documentation. It will readily be appreciated that this activity relates to the provision of life support equipment to the public and there is a real public interest in ensuring that standards are observed in the maintenance and servicing of that equipment. • That persons or organisations involved in the hiring out of diving equipment should maintain reliable systems to record the number of occasions on which individual items of equipment are hired out: that persons to whom such equipment is hired should be required to complete a record of the number of dives on which the equipment was used during the period of hire. If that information is not provided hire centres should assume that not less than two dives per day occurred during the period of hire. • That a means of unique visual identification and which is visible from distance be carried by each diver on his hood and that such unique identification should form part of the dive log retained by the Divemaster or other supervisory person who remains on shore. • That in the course of any dive in which more than two persons participate, the dive supervisor or, if not appointed, the dive leader, be responsible for a formal headcount on the divers surfacing to ensure the immediate integrity of the group of persons participating in that dive.
Under section 28 of the 2016 Act, each recipient of a recommendation must respond within 8 weeks. The window from publication ran to 15 November 2001. See how we track responses.

Section 28 responses

Response pending

No response has been identified on the case landing page yet. The 8-week window has closed without a published response or non-response notice.

Determination details

Reference
FAI-MOHAMMED-TASLEEN-IQBAL
Published
20 September 2001
Sheriff
Sheriff T.A.K. Drummond
Sheriffdom
Lothian and Borders

Navigation

About FAIs

Fatal Accident Inquiries are held under the 2016 Act before a sheriff. They are mandatory for deaths in custody and at work. The sheriff may make recommendations under s.26(1)(b); recipients must respond within 8 weeks under s.28. See the methodology page for detail.

More on FAIs

Sources