Source · CQC inspection

East Cosham House

Type Social Care Org Region South East Last inspected 8 Jan 2020

Archived This service was archived (deregistered) by CQC on 2 Dec 2020. The ratings below are historical and do not reflect a current service.

Location rating: Requires Improvement  View location on CQC

Location ratings by domain

Five CQC key questions

Ratings held for this CQC location, last inspected 8 January 2020. Ratings extracted from individual reports are shown separately below.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Requires Improvement
Caring
Good
Responsive
Requires Improvement
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Most recent report indexed for actions

The date and rating here are from an individual report, not necessarily the location's latest assessment. Report ratings are extracted with AI; verify the original PDF.

Type: Planned inspection
Date: 8 January 2020
Rating extracted from this report: Requires Improvement
Actions indexed: 7 must-do

Read this inspection PDF

AI-extracted 17 Feb 2026

Earlier inspection findings

pre-2024 framework · 7 must-do

Must-do actions (7)

Legal requirements based on regulation breaches identified during inspection.

Must-do action 1 of 7
Must do
Well-led
There was a failure to notify CQC of any abuse or allegation of abuse in relation to a service user.
Regulation: Regulation 18 Registration Regulations 2009 Notifications of other incidents
⚠ There was a failure to notify CQC of any abuse or allegation of abuse in relation to a service user.
Must-do action 2 of 7
Must do
Safe
Systems were either not in place or not robust enough to ensure the safe and proper management of medicines. This placed people at risk of harm.
Regulation: Regulation 12 HSCA RA Regulations 2014 Safe care and treatment
⚠ Systems were either not in place or not robust enough to ensure the safe and proper management of medicines. This placed people at risk of harm.
Must-do action 3 of 7
Must do
Safe
There was a failure to ensure risks relating to the safety and welfare of people using the service were assessed and managed. Risk assessments were not always in place where required and Nice best practice guidance was not followed in relation to a head injury.
Regulation: Regulation 12 HSCA RA Regulations 2014 Safe care and treatment
⚠ There was a failure to ensure risks relating to the safety and welfare of people using the service were assessed and managed. Risk assessments were not always in place where required and Nice best practice guidance was not followed in relation to a head injury.
Must-do action 4 of 7
Must do
Safe
There was a failure to prevent the risk of, detect and control the spread of infections. Some equipment was not included on cleaning schedules and was visually dirty.
Regulation: Regulation 12 HSCA RA Regulations 2014 Safe care and treatment
⚠ There was a failure to prevent the risk of, detect and control the spread of infections. Some equipment was not included on cleaning schedules and was visually dirty.
Must-do action 5 of 7
Must do
Safe
There was a failure to safeguard service users from abuse and improper treatment. Records showed that that where incidents had occurred between people these had not been reported to the local safeguarding team. It was also unclear how the records of such incidents were used to inform staff responses should further incidents occur.
Regulation: Regulation 13 HSCA RA Regulations 2014 Safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment
⚠ There was a failure to safeguard service users from abuse and improper treatment. Records showed that that where incidents had occurred between people these had not been reported to the local safeguarding team. It was also unclear how the records of such incidents were used to inform staff responses should …
Must-do action 6 of 7
Must do
Safe
There was failure to ensure that premises and equipment used by the service provider were properly maintained and were suitable for the purpose for which they are being used. People were not living in an environment that was properly maintained. In the small lounge there was a floor level radiator which was sharp and hot. The panelling which was meant to cover the radiator had been removed which left the radiator uncovered. This meant if people touched the radiator or fell near it there was a high risk of burns and cuts.
Regulation: Regulation 15 HSCA RA Regulations 2014 Premises and equipment
⚠ There was failure to ensure that premises and equipment used by the service provider were properly maintained and were suitable for the purpose for which they are being used. People were not living in an environment that was properly maintained. In the small lounge there was a floor level radiator …
Must-do action 7 of 7
Must do
Well-led
There was a failure to have effective and established systems and processes in place to monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service.
Regulation: Regulation 17 HSCA RA Regulations 2014 Good governance
⚠ There was a failure to have effective and established systems and processes in place to monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service.