Home / Sources / CQC / Ranyard at Mulberry House
Source · CQC inspection

Ranyard at Mulberry House

Type Social Care Org Region London Last inspected 18 Mar 2015

Archived This service was archived (deregistered) by CQC on 5 Nov 2015. The ratings below are historical and do not reflect a current service.

Location rating: Requires Improvement  View location on CQC

Location ratings by domain

Five CQC key questions

Ratings held for this CQC location, last inspected 18 March 2015. Ratings extracted from individual reports are shown separately below.

Safe
Good
Effective
Requires Improvement
Caring
Good
Responsive
Requires Improvement
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Most recent report indexed for actions

The date and rating here are from an individual report, not necessarily the location's latest assessment. Report ratings are extracted with AI; verify the original PDF.

Type: Comprehensive inspection
Date: 18 March 2015
Rating extracted from this report: Requires Improvement
Actions indexed: 2 must-do 1 should-do

Read this inspection PDF

AI-extracted 17 Feb 2026

Earlier inspection findings

pre-2024 framework · 2 must-do 1 should-do

Must-do actions (2)

Legal requirements based on regulation breaches identified during inspection.

Must-do action 1 of 2
Must do
Effective
Persons employed by the service provider did not receive appropriate training to enable them to carry out the activities they were employed to perform.
Regulation: Regulation 18 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 Staffing
⚠ Persons employed by the service provider did not receive appropriate training to enable them to carry out the activities they were employed to perform.
Must-do action 2 of 2
Must do
Well-led
Systems were not established to seek and act on feedback from relevant persons on the services provided for the purposes of continually evaluating and improving the services.
Regulation: Regulation 17 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 Good governance
⚠ Systems were not established to seek and act on feedback from relevant persons on the services provided for the purposes of continually evaluating and improving the services.

Should-do actions (1)

Recommended improvements to enhance service quality.

Should-do action 1 of 1
Should do
Safe
The provider should note for medicines administered as skin patches there was no record of the applicationsite, so it was unclear whether a different area of skin was used each time the patch was changed to avoid damage to the skin.