Source · CQC inspection

Bracken House

Type Social Care Org Region West Midlands Last inspected 23 Oct 2023

Location rating: Requires Improvement  View location on CQC

Location ratings by domain

Five CQC key questions

Ratings held for this CQC location, last inspected 23 October 2023. Ratings extracted from individual reports are shown separately below.

Safe
Good
Effective
Requires Improvement
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Most recent report indexed for actions

The date and rating here are from an individual report, not necessarily the location's latest assessment. Report ratings are extracted with AI; verify the original PDF.

Type: Focused inspection
Date: 23 October 2023
Rating extracted from this report: Requires Improvement
Actions indexed: 5 should-do

Read this inspection PDF

AI-extracted 17 Feb 2026

Earlier inspection findings

pre-2024 framework · 5 should-do

Should-do actions (5)

Recommended improvements to enhance service quality.

Should-do action 1 of 5
Should do
Well-led
Systems used to complete documentation did not always enable the provider to record people's information in the way they needed to. For example, where the provider had discussed the use of bed sensors with people and had assessed their capacity, this had not been documented.
Should-do action 2 of 5
Should do
Well-led
Quality checks failed to identify where sufficient action had not been taken to address environmental risks in the home. For example, where there was a delay by the building provider in replacing 3 soiled bedroom carpets, the provider failed to arrange for a broken carpet cleaner to be fixed which may have helped to reduce the risk of spread of infection.
Should-do action 3 of 5
Should do
Well-led
Systems in place failed to identify where the provider had not taken sufficient action to ensure visitors to the home were not at risk when using the lift when the light had broken. For example, there was no signage up to make them aware that emergency lighting only was in use.
Should-do action 4 of 5
Should do
Well-led
Quality checks in place did not identify when clinical monitoring checks were not required. For example, staff were required to input records related to bowel monitoring when people did not have any needs or risks related to continence.
Should-do action 5 of 5
Should do
Well-led
People and relatives told us the management team could be more visible in the home.

Previous inspection

1 December 2022
Rating extracted from this reportRequires Improvement
TypeComprehensive inspection
Actions 1 must-do 1 should-do

Read previous inspection PDF

1 resolved 1 repeated