Source · CQC inspection

Rosglen Residential Home

Type Social Care Org Region Yorkshire & Humberside Last inspected 16 Sep 2015

Archived This service was archived (deregistered) by CQC on 20 Dec 2017. The ratings below are historical and do not reflect a current service.

Location rating: Requires Improvement  View location on CQC

Location ratings by domain

Five CQC key questions

Ratings held for this CQC location, last inspected 16 September 2015. Ratings extracted from individual reports are shown separately below.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Most recent report indexed for actions

The date and rating here are from an individual report, not necessarily the location's latest assessment. Report ratings are extracted with AI; verify the original PDF.

Type: Comprehensive inspection
Date: 16 September 2015
Rating extracted from this report: Requires improvement
Actions indexed: 1 must-do 8 should-do

Read this inspection PDF

AI-extracted 17 Feb 2026

Earlier inspection findings

pre-2024 framework · 1 must-do 8 should-do

Must-do actions (1)

Legal requirements based on regulation breaches identified during inspection.

Must-do action 1 of 1
Must do
Safe
The provider must ensure recruitment procedures operate effectively in a way to ensure persons employed are of good character and have the qualifications, competence, skills and experience necessary for the work to be performed.
Regulation: Regulation 19 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 Fit and proper persons employed
⚠ Recruitment procedures did not operate effectively in a way to ensure persons employed were of good character and had the qualifications, competence, skills and experience necessary for the work to be performed.

Should-do actions (8)

Recommended improvements to enhance service quality.

Should-do action 1 of 8
Should do
Well-led
The provider should implement formal monitoring to assess how the service runs and identify areas for improvement in accordance with the service’s statement of purpose.
Should-do action 2 of 8
Should do
Safe
The provider should address the use of multiple assessment tools for the same person for the same area of risk, which produced conflicting information.
Should-do action 3 of 8
Should do
Safe
The provider should look at measures to reduce the room temperature where medicines are stored, as it was regularly recorded at 26 degrees, exceeding the safe storage recommendation of 25 degrees.
Should-do action 4 of 8
Should do
Safe
The provider should cease the practice of providing loans to people and ensure safeguards are sufficiently robust to protect people from the risk of financial abuse and/or errors, including accurate records.
Should-do action 5 of 8
Should do
Effective
The provider should discuss with the person and their social worker to establish the most appropriate method for managing their finances, considering alternatives and ensuring capacity assessments are in place where appropriate, as there was no information or capacity assessment to show the person did not have capacity to manage their own finances.
Should-do action 6 of 8
Should do
Caring
The provider should consider if the arrangement of locking the kitchen at night and people handing in cigarettes is the most appropriate way to manage the safety risk whilst allowing independence.
Should-do action 7 of 8
Should do
Well-led
The provider should ensure formal visits from a director or proprietor take place each month, with a comprehensive checklist completed and actions identified for improvement, as stated in the service’s statement of purpose.
Should-do action 8 of 8
Should do
Well-led
The provider should ensure the registered manager receives professional supervision once a month from the proprietor, in accordance with the service’s statement of purpose.