Home / Sources / CQC / Lindcare Ltd
Source · CQC inspection

Lindcare Ltd

Type Social Care Org Region Yorkshire & Humberside Last inspected 18 Aug 2022

Location rating: Requires Improvement  View location on CQC

Location ratings by domain

Five CQC key questions

Ratings held for this CQC location, last inspected 18 August 2022. Ratings extracted from individual reports are shown separately below.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Most recent report indexed for actions

The date and rating here are from an individual report, not necessarily the location's latest assessment. Report ratings are extracted with AI; verify the original PDF.

Type: Comprehensive inspection
Date: 18 August 2022
Rating extracted from this report: Requires Improvement
Actions indexed: 2 must-do

Read this inspection PDF

AI-extracted 17 Feb 2026

Earlier inspection findings

pre-2024 framework · 2 must-do

Must-do actions (2)

Legal requirements based on regulation breaches identified during inspection.

Must-do action 1 of 2
Must do
Well-led
The provider must ensure systems and processes are in place to maintain staffing records in relation to persons employed in the carrying on of regulated activities, including recruitment, training and employment levels.
Regulation: Regulation 17 (Good governance)
⚠ The registered manager had a lack of oversight of staffing records including recruitment, training and employment levels.
Must-do action 2 of 2
Must do
Safe
The provider must ensure safe staffing and recruitment procedures are established and operated effectively to ensure that persons employed are of good character, including robust recruitment checks, complete employment application forms, and comprehensive references from previous employers.
Regulation: Regulation 19 (Fit and proper persons employed)
⚠ Recruitment checks were not robust; the registered manager had a lack of oversight of staff providing the regulated activity (personal care). Employment application forms were sometimes missing or incomplete. References from previous employers were missing, incomplete, or lacked basic details.