Home / Sources / CQC / Camphill Health Centre
Source · CQC inspection

Camphill Health Centre

Type Primary Medical Services Region West Midlands Last inspected 26 Oct 2022

Archived This service was archived (deregistered) by CQC on 8 Mar 2023. The ratings below are historical and do not reflect a current service.

Location rating: Requires Improvement  View location on CQC

Location ratings by domain

Five CQC key questions

Ratings held for this CQC location, last inspected 26 October 2022. Ratings extracted from individual reports are shown separately below.

Safe
Good
Effective
Good
Caring
Good
Responsive
Requires Improvement
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Most recent report indexed for actions

The date and rating here are from an individual report, not necessarily the location's latest assessment. Report ratings are extracted with AI; verify the original PDF.

Type: Comprehensive inspection
Date: 26 October 2022
Rating extracted from this report: Requires Improvement
Actions indexed: 1 must-do 2 should-do

Read this inspection PDF

AI-extracted 17 Feb 2026

Earlier inspection findings

pre-2024 framework · 1 must-do 2 should-do

Must-do actions (1)

Legal requirements based on regulation breaches identified during inspection.

Must-do action 1 of 1
Must do
Well-led
Establisheffectivesystemsandprocessestoensuregoodgovernanceinaccordancewiththefundamentalstandards ofcare.
Regulation: Regulation 17 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 Good governance
⚠ Goodgovernancesystemsandprocesseswerenotalways effectiveorfollowed.Inparticular: Therewasalackofoversighttoensurepoliciesand proceduresregardingmedicinesmanagementand effectivemanagementofpatientswasapplied. Safetyalertswerenotalwaysfollowed.Forexample, • Therewere39femalepatientsofchild-bearingagewho wereprescribedmedicinesthatmaycauseside-effects inpregnancy.Wereviewed5ofthesepatientsand found3hadeffectivecontraceptioninplace.Therewas nodocumentationtoshowanyofthepatientshad beeninformedoftheriskofthesemedicinesin pregnancy. • Wefound50patientswereprescribedaspecific medicinetotreatdiabetesthathadararebutserious sideeffect.Asafetyalertissuedin2019,advised clinicianstoensurepatientssoughturgentmedical attentioniftheyexperiencedsymptoms.Asampleof5 ofthe50recordswerereviewedandtherewasno evidencetosuggestpatientshadbeeninformed. Areviewofthepatientrecordsystemshowedthepractice hadcarriedout261medicinereviewsintheprevious12 months.Wereviewed5patientsandfounddocumentation wasnotfullydetailed.Forexample,2patientswere prescribedhighstrengthpainreliefmedicines.Itwas notedthatcompliancewaschecked.However,therewas notarecordofwhetherthemedicineswereeffective.Two ofthereviewshadnotconsideredallthemedicines prescribedtothepatients. Themonitoringofpatientswithpoorlycontrolleddiabetes wasnotconsistent.ThiswasinbreachofRegulation17(1)oftheHealthand SocialCareAct2008(RegulatedActivities)Regulations 2014.

Should-do actions (2)

Recommended improvements to enhance service quality.

Should-do action 1 of 2
Should do
Effective
Continuetotakemeasurestoimprovetheuptakeofchildhoodimmunisationsandcervicalscreening.
Should-do action 2 of 2
Should do
Responsive
Continuetotakeactionstoimprovepatientsatisfaction.