Home / Sources / CQC / Widnes Hall
Source · CQC inspection

Widnes Hall

Provider Anchor Hanover Group Type Social Care Org Region North West Last inspected 1 Feb 2023

Location rating: Requires Improvement  View location on CQC

Location ratings by domain

Five CQC key questions

Ratings held for this CQC location, last inspected 1 February 2023. Ratings extracted from individual reports are shown separately below.

Safe
Requires Improvement
Effective
Requires Improvement
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Requires Improvement

Most recent report indexed for actions

The date and rating here are from an individual report, not necessarily the location's latest assessment. Report ratings are extracted with AI; verify the original PDF.

Type: Comprehensive inspection
Date: 1 February 2023
Rating extracted from this report: Requires Improvement
Actions indexed: 3 must-do

Read this inspection PDF

AI-extracted 17 Feb 2026

Earlier inspection findings

pre-2024 framework · 3 must-do

Must-do actions (3)

Legal requirements based on regulation breaches identified during inspection.

Must-do action 1 of 3
Must do
Effective
The provider must ensure consent to care and treatment of service users is provided by the relevant person.
Regulation: Regulation 11 HSCA RA Regulations 2014 Need for consent
⚠ The provider failed to ensure consent to care and treatment of service users was provided by the relevant person.
Must-do action 2 of 3
Must do
Safe
The provider must assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health safety and welfare of service users.
Regulation: Regulation 12 HSCA RA Regulations 2014 Safe care and treatment
⚠ The provider failed to assess, monitor and mitigate the risks relating to the health safety and welfare of service users.
Must-do action 3 of 3
Must do
Well-led
The provider must operate effective systems to ensure the safety and quality of the service.
Regulation: Regulation 17 HSCA RA Regulations 2014 Good governance
⚠ The provider failed to operate effective systems to ensure the safety and quality of the service. This placed people at risk of harm.