Source · CQC inspection
Ashdale Care Home
Type Social Care Org
Region East Midlands
Last inspected 15 Nov 2023
Overall rating: Inadequate View full CQC report
Domain ratings
Safe
Inadequate
Effective
Requires Improvement
Caring
Good
Responsive
Good
Well-led
Inadequate
Earlier inspection findings
Must-do actions (13)
Must-do action 1 of 13
Must do
Safe
The provider did not have suitable equipment to support people who were at risk of falling out of bed.
Must-do action 2 of 13
Must do
Safe
The provider had not completed routine water maintenance. This means there is an increased risk from legionella bacteria, which can cause serious ill health.
Must-do action 3 of 13
Must do
Safe
The fire alarm system had a fault, this had not been investigated or resolved.
Must-do action 4 of 13
Must do
Safe
The radiators in the care home did not heat the home enough. During the inspection, the provider was unable to resolve this heating issue.
Must-do action 5 of 13
Must do
Safe
We were not assured staff were adequately trained. At the last inspection, we identified concerns with staff skills, limited action had been taken to provide further training.
Must-do action 6 of 13
Must do
Safe
People using the care home could be at risk of choking. Only 1 staff member had received relevant training on how to support people's swallowing needs, there was a lack of guidance in the kitchen for staff to follow.
Must-do action 7 of 13
Must do
Safe
At the last inspection, staff did not have clear care plan guidance on how to support people. The provider gave inspectors an example of a 'dummy care plan'. However, this example document lacked guidance on what information would be within care plans to ensure staff had clear guidance to follow.
Must-do action 8 of 13
Must do
Safe
The provider was not able to provide a clear list of employed staff names, their recruitment details or what training they had received.
Must-do action 9 of 13
Must do
Well-led
The provider did not have a clear action plan to describe what their ongoing plans were. This is because the action plan did not have expected completion dates, or which staff member would be responsible for taking the planned action. The provider had implemented new policies. However, these policies lacked detail.
Must-do action 10 of 13
Must do
Well-led
Clear governance structures had not been implemented. For example, we were told that people would be weighed weekly. However, there was no clear documentation on how this would be effectively implemented and reviewed.
Must-do action 11 of 13
Must do
Well-led
There was no registered manager in place. The previous registered manager had left the role in June 2023. It is a legal requirement for Ashdale Care Home to have a registered manager in place, as they are legally accountable for the running of the service.
Must-do action 12 of 13
Must do
Well-led
Following the inspection, we were advised that the management structure would change. We were sent a new planned organisational structure chart. This did not provide us with sufficient assurances, as there were 3 vacancies in this chart and no clarity on when this managerial change would occur.
Must-do action 13 of 13
Must do
Effective
At the last inspection, the principles of the mental capacity act were not followed. At this inspection, documentation had not changed, and a member of the management team advised that similar processes would be followed.
Previous inspection
| Rating | Inadequate |
| Type | Focused inspection |
| Actions | 4 must-do |
4 repeated