FP78

Recommendation 78

Fingerprint Inquiry · The Fingerprint Inquiry Report · Issued 14 December 2011

Government responseNo response yet

DeliveryNo statement from the addressee found

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation, Chapter 43; Para 40.119

The system of registration on the National Register of Fingerprint Experts should be reviewed. If it continues in use it should be revised to ensure that the criteria for registration and the records are kept up to date and that the records indicate competence. Should SPSA for any reason decide that an examiner is no longer competent to practise, it should notify the NPIA so that the examiner’s name is removed from the register and also the Scottish Government so that authorisation under section 280 is withdrawn.

Fingerprint Inquiry, The Fingerprint Inquiry Report · 14 Dec 2011 Source PDF, page 751 →

Report-level response context

The Scottish Government's news release of 14 December 2011, the day the report was published, is its only published statement on the recommendations. Its one sentence about them is given for all of them together and states no position. The Scottish Police Services Authority's release of the same day accepts "all of the recommendations made of it by the Inquiry" without listing them; the site records that on the recommendations addressed to its forensic service. The Authority no longer exists, and the site files its words under the Scottish Police Authority, which took over its forensic services in 2013.

Government response

●No formal government response recorded

The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.

Delivery

No statement on delivery from the addressee has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.