WeProtect international action on CSAM
IICSA · The Internet Investigation Report · Issued 31 March 2020 · Addressed to: UK Government
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation, J
The government should press the WeProtect Global Alliance to take more action internationally to ensure that those countries hosting indecent images of children implement legislation and procedures to prevent access to such imagery.
IICSA, The Internet Investigation Report · 31 Mar 2020 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:
- In May 2023, the government stated that it continued to press the WeProtect Global Alliance to take more international action (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published assessment of the outcomes of UK diplomatic engagement with the WeProtect Global Alliance since 2023 has been identified to March 2026.
Response — verbatim from government
●UK Government
On 10 November 2020, the UK government committed to continue working with the WeProtect Global Alliance to make combating indecent images of children, grooming and live streaming a priority. It stated that it would do this via board meetings and ensuring the WeProtect Global Alliance develops and disseminates key resources.
UK Government · 22 May 2023 Written response →
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
No published activity has been recorded against this recommendation yet.
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.