SP59 Accepted

Audit of safeguarding information transfer between schools

Southport Inquiry · The Southport Inquiry Report: Phase 1 · Issued 13 April 2026 · Addressed to: Department for Education

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The Department for Education should carry out an audit to ensure that safeguarding information is reliably being passed between schools and should consider what further role Ofsted may play to strengthen protection in this area.

Southport Inquiry, The Southport Inquiry Report: Phase 1 · 13 Apr 2026 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The government stated the Department for Education expects to complete a sample audit of schools to assess the reliability of safeguarding information transfer by late 2027, with learning considered when updating Keeping Children Safe in Education 2027 (Government Response to Phase 1 of the Southport Inquiry, CP 1623, Home Office, July 2026).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by claude-opus-4-8 on 02 Jul 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)

Response — verbatim from government

Department for Education

Department for Education (DfE) is the lead department and expects to complete this recommendation by late 2027. Progress and next steps:
- DfE will undertake a sample audit of schools to assess the reliability of safeguarding information transfer.
- DfE will consider learning from the audit when updating Keeping Children Safe in Education 2027 and also how findings are relevant to Ofsted areas of inspection.

Department for Education · 2 Jul 2026 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 2 Jul 2026 · Department for Education Government response published 2 July 2026 (CP 1623). The government accepted this recommendation; the lead department reports implementation is in progress. Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.