SP57 Accepted

Agencies to respect school insight on risk

Southport Inquiry · The Southport Inquiry Report: Phase 1 · Issued 13 April 2026 · Addressed to: Home Office

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The Home Office (for police forces nationwide) Counter Terrorism Police Headquarters (for Prevent), Department of Health and Social Care (for all healthcare providers) and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (for all local authorities regarding their social care functions) should issue a nationwide reminder to all agencies considering the risk that children pose to others of the importance of respecting the insight offered by the child’s school if they raise concern about the severity of risk that the child poses to others. As was the case with AR at The Acorns School, teachers will often spend more time observing the child (and their interaction with peers) than is available to other professionals. Warnings from teachers and/or schools with particular expertise (including but not limited to Pupil Referral Units) should be given particular weight.

Southport Inquiry, The Southport Inquiry Report: Phase 1 · 13 Apr 2026 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 received Royal Assent on 29 April 2026, amending safeguarding arrangements so that designated childcare or education agencies must be included in local multi-agency safeguarding structures (Children's Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026, legislation.gov.uk, April 2026).
- A gov.uk news release described the Act becoming law and introducing a new duty to share information regarding the safety and welfare of children (Families to save up to £1,000 as children's reforms become law, Department for Education, April 2026).
- The government response stated ministers from the Home Office, MHCLG and DHSC have written to local safeguarding partners and that a measure in the Act places a duty on safeguarding partners to secure the participation of education and childcare settings, and reported this recommendation as completed (Government Response to Phase 1 of the Southport Inquiry, CP 1623, Home Office, July 2026).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by claude-opus-4-8 on 02 Jul 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)

Response — verbatim from government

Home Office

The Home Office, Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), with input from Department for Education (DfE) are the lead departments and have completed this recommendation. Progress and next steps:
- Ministers from the Home Office, MHCLG, and DHSC have written to local safeguarding partners.
- Through a measure in the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026, DfE are placing a duty on statutory safeguarding partners to automatically secure the participation of education and childcare settings as relevant agencies. This will ensure that their views are sufficiently included and represented at strategic and operational levels in multi-agency safeguarding arrangements. The aim of this measure is to strengthen the role of education and childcare in multi-agency safeguarding arrangements to better protect children from abuse, neglect, and exploitation.

Home Office · 2 Jul 2026 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 2 Jul 2026 · Home Office Government response published 2 July 2026 (CP 1623). The government accepted this recommendation and reports it as completed. Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.