SP9 Accepted

NWAS Major Incident declaration procedures

Southport Inquiry · The Southport Inquiry Report: Phase 1 · Issued 13 April 2026 · Addressed to: North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

North West Ambulance Service should review its procedures for declaring a Major Incident or Major Incident (Standby) to ensure clarity in how declarations are made and how they are communicated internally and to other emergency services.

Southport Inquiry, The Southport Inquiry Report: Phase 1 · 13 Apr 2026 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- NHS England and the Department of Health and Social Care stated that, in the spirit of recommendations 9 and 10, there is an opportunity to deliver an improved national response, and that these recommendations should sit with the Emergency Resilience Unit working with the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives and ambulance trusts, and where relevant the College of Policing and the national JESIP Team, to review and standardise across sectors (Government Response to Phase 1 of the Southport Inquiry, CP 1623, Home Office, July 2026).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by claude-opus-4-8 on 02 Jul 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)

Response — verbatim from government

NHS England

DHSC and NHS England support the issues that the recommendations for the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) are directed towards. However, while NHS England considers local review of procedures and terminology to be important and necessary, the greater opportunity is to ensure consistent national arrangements across all ambulance trusts in line with the principles of JESIP. Therefore, there is opportunity to go further, in the spirit of recommendations 9 and 10, to deliver an improved national response. In line with our approach to consider emergency response nationally, the response to a major incident should not be determined by one ambulance trust in isolation and should not be treated as a matter for NWAS alone, in line with JESIP doctrine such as the 'Shared Situational Awareness' principle of JESIP. NHS England recognises the importance of clear procedures for declaring a Major Incident or Major Incident Standby, and for ensuring that declarations are communicated quickly and consistently within ambulance services and to emergency service partners. While NWAS should review its own systems and procedures, terminology used in major incident response must be consistent across all ambulance trusts and aligned with police, fire and wider emergency service partners, in line with the 'Communicate' principle of JESIP. The key risk is that local changes made by one trust could create further variation unless they are aligned to a national standard. The priority should be a nationally consistent approach across ambulance services and emergency service partners, so that terminology supports interoperability rather than creating local variation. Therefore, recommendations 9 and 10 should also sit with the Emergency Resilience Unit working with Association of Ambulance Chief Executives and ambulance trusts, and where relevant, the College of Policing, the national JESIP Team and other relevant partners to review and standardise across sectors. (Government Response to Phase 1 of the Southport Inquiry, CP 1623, 2 July 2026.)

NHS England · 2 Jul 2026 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 2 Jul 2026 · NHS England Government response published 2 July 2026 (CP 1623). The government agreed with this recommendation and addressed it in the response; the named body's delivery is in progress. Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.