SHEE-35 Historic

Urgently fit approved, watertight emergency lighting units on Ro/Ro ferries

Sheen Inquiry · Sheen Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 24 July 1987

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

As a matter of urgency, self-contained, maintained emergency lighting units of a type approved by the Department should be fitted to all Ro/Ro passenger ferries in suitable numbers and in such places as may be advised by the Department. It is essential in our view that such units should be watertight - in other words, if the unit should be submerged it should remain alight until the batteries run down. Furthermore, a regular routine check on the condition of this emergency lighting should be a requirement. This could perhaps be a weekly inspection by the ship’s electrical officer followed by logging that all was in order.

Sheen Inquiry, Sheen Inquiry — Final Report · 24 Jul 1987 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

No formal government response has been recorded for this recommendation. No independent verification has been carried out.

Sources

Based on tracking data in the inquiry database.
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by baseline-data-v1 on 17 Aug 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)

Response — verbatim from government

No formal government response recorded

The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

No published activity has been recorded against this recommendation yet.

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.