BRIS-116

Provide opportunity to report sentinel events in confidence

Bristol Heart Inquiry · Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 18 July 2001

Government responseNot tracked (historical inquiry)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say completed (Feb 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

The opportunity should exist to report a sentinel event in confidence.

Bristol Heart Inquiry, Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · 18 Jul 2001 Source PDF →

Government response

●No formal government response recorded

The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say completed · 27 Feb 2026

The Thirlwall Inquiry has noted action taken in response to this recommendation.

NHS England’s patient safety event recording policy encourages staff of all levels to record events which they believe may impact upon the safety of their patients. This includes areas of good practice which can be learned from. NHS England also supports staff to record anonymously, to provide psychological safety where individuals may fear the repercussions of speaking up. The recently introduced Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service, the national database of records of patient safety incidents from across England, supports this policy, and allows frontline staff and safety/governance teams to collaboratively develop the record of what happened.

Freedom to speak up

In the case of concerns, NHS England has published a Freedom to Speak Up policy for the NHS which provides the minimum standard for local Freedom to Speak Up policies across the NHS. All NHS organisations and others providing NHS healthcare services in primary and secondary care in England are required to adopt the Freedom to Speak Up Policy as a minimum standard to normalise speaking up for the benefit of patients and workers. This is embedded in the NHS Standard Contract. It is the role of every NHS Board to assess how effective the speaking up arrangements in place are at an organisational level. Freedom to Speak Up is also part of the Care Quality Commission Well Led framework. As such, the Care Quality Commission will consider whether arrangements for speaking up are sufficient and working well.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – Closed”. Table row: section 6.2 No. 116, PDF page 122-123.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

The Government agreed with this recommendation.

In its January 2002 response, the Department of Health said information reported to the National Patient Safety Agency would be held in confidence.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review colours its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green, which it uses to mark evidence, identified by the legal team, that a recommendation has been clearly implemented. Table row: section 6.2 No. 116, PDF page 109.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.