BRIS-107

Create open, non-punitive NHS environment for reporting sentinel events

Bristol Heart Inquiry · Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 18 July 2001

Government responseNot tracked (historical inquiry)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Every effort should be made to create in the NHS an open and non-punitive environment in which it is safe to report and admit sentinel events.

Bristol Heart Inquiry, Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · 18 Jul 2001 Source PDF →

Government response

●No formal government response recorded

The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

Every health and care professional has a professional duty to be open and honest when things go wrong.

NHS England have published a national Freedom to speak up policy for the NHS, applicable to primary care, secondary care and integrated care systems, focusing on the importance of inclusive and consistent speaking up arrangements and driving learning through listening. With the National Guardian’s Office NHS England have also published Freedom to speak up (FTSU) guidance and a Freedom to speak up reflection and planning tool, each to help ensure staff have a voice that counts to develop a speaking up culture.

CQC’s well-led framework incorporates review of FTSU arrangements and culture.

NHS England promotes a 'just culture'. The just culture guide encourages managers to treat staff involved in a patient safety incident in a consistent, constructive and fair way.

The NHS Patient Safety Strategy, published in July 2019 and updated in 2021, sets out how the NHS will support staff and providers to share safety insight and empower people – patients and staff – with the skills, confidence and mechanisms to improve safety. An update in June 2023 set out that much progress has been made across the strategy’s main programmes of work. It describes how NHS England will continuously improve patient safety, building on the foundations of a safer culture and safer systems and highlights the importance of a just culture. It states that there are many aspects to a good safety culture and that leaders need to play a key role in championing its development.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – Ongoing”. Table row: section 6.2 No. 107, PDF page 119.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

The Government agreed with this recommendation.

In its January 2002 response, the Department of Health referred to the work of the National Patient Safety Agency with the clinical governance initiative and the Department’s Risk Management System as aiming to develop a culture where non-punitive reporting of adverse incidents would help to improve patient safety.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 6.2 No. 107, PDF page 107.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.