Re-form local ethics committees to assess new invasive clinical procedures
Bristol Heart Inquiry · Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 18 July 2001
Government responseNot tracked (historical inquiry)
DeliveryDHSC and NHS England state no delivery position (Feb 2026)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
Local research ethics committees should be re-formed as necessary so that they are capable of considering applications to undertake new and hitherto untried invasive clinical procedures.
Bristol Heart Inquiry, Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · 18 Jul 2001 Source PDF →
Government response
●No formal government response recorded
The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.
Delivery
●DHSC and NHS England state no delivery position · 27 Feb 2026
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) interventional procedures programme assesses the efficacy and safety of interventional procedures used for treatment or diagnosis to determine whether they work well enough and are safe enough for use in the NHS.
The NHS HRA provides policies and standards in respect of research in the health sector, including best practice guidance and model agreements. HRA uses UK Clinical Research Collaborations (UKCRC) model agreements which are legally compliant.
What other bodies have found
●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024
The Government agreed in principle with this recommendation.
In its January 2002 response, the Department of Health said that new interventional procedures would need to be overseen and scrutinised by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence from April 2002 and local research ethics committees would need to consider any studies of new procedures as advised by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. The Department said guidance on the new arrangements would specify local systems for managing new interventional procedures and would be issued in 2002.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.