Involve NHS and public in establishing selection criteria for healthcare professionals
Bristol Heart Inquiry · Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 18 July 2001
Government responseNot tracked (historical inquiry)
DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say partially delivered (Feb 2026)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The NHS and the public should be involved in (a) establishing the criteria for selection and (b) the selection of those to be educated as doctors, nurses and as other healthcare professionals.
Bristol Heart Inquiry, Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · 18 Jul 2001 Source PDF →
Government response
●No formal government response recorded
The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.
Delivery
●DHSC and NHS England say partially delivered · 27 Feb 2026
Please see Recommendation 46 (Professional standards).
Professional regulators regularly consult to make sure policies are well informed and meet the needs of healthcare professional and patients in the UK. Examples include:
• The NMC standards for education and training include the standards framework for nursing and midwifery education. The NMC last consulted on these in 2021 via a public survey • Current GMC consultations. From 27 April to 20 July 2022 the GMC ran a public consultation on the updated Good medical practice, its guidance on the standards of care and professional behaviour it expect from all medical professionals registered with it.
What other bodies have found
●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024
The Government agreed with this recommendation in principle.
In its January 2002 response, the Department of Health said that all recruitment and admission procedures were based on published criteria to assist transparency and that it was committed to encouraging broad participation in selection procedures.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.