Urgently review compensation system for medical harm, replacing clinical negligence
Bristol Heart Inquiry · Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 18 July 2001
Government responseNot tracked (historical inquiry)
DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say completed (Feb 2026)
Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
There should be an urgent review of the system for providing compensation to those who suffer harm arising out of medical care. The review should be concerned with the introduction of an administrative system for responding promptly to patients’ needs in place of the current system of clinical negligence and should take account of other administrative systems for meeting the financial needs of the public. (See further the Recommendations on the safety of care.)
Bristol Heart Inquiry, Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · 18 Jul 2001 Source PDF →
Government response
●No formal government response recorded
The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.
Delivery
●DHSC and NHS England say completed · 27 Feb 2026
The Thirlwall Inquiry has noted action taken in response to this recommendation. Please see response to recommendation 119.
What other bodies have found
●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024
The Government agreed with this recommendation.
In its January 2002 response, the Department of Health said it had announced plans to produce a White Paper early in 2002, discussing options for reform to the system for dealing with clinical negligence claims.
A report was published by the Department of Health in July 2003, setting out proposals for reforming the approach to clinical negligence in the NHS. The NHS Redress Act 2006, containing provisions for the establishment of a redress scheme outside the scope of civil proceedings, was enacted but never brought into force.
How this page is built
The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.