BRIS-31

Require trusts to publish periodic reports on patient views and actions

Bristol Heart Inquiry · Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 18 July 2001

Government responseNot tracked (historical inquiry)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Trusts and primary care trusts must have systems for publishing periodic reports on patients’ views and suggestions, including information about the action taken in the light of them. (See further the Recommendations on care of an appropriate standard.)

Bristol Heart Inquiry, Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · 18 Jul 2001 Source PDF →

Government response

●No formal government response recorded

The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

Please see our responses to Recommendations 20 (PALS) and 28 (patient feedback) for current practice.

The main duties for NHS bodies to make arrangements to involve the public are all set out in the National Health Services Act 2006, as amended by the Health and Care Act 2022:

• section 14Z45 for integrated care boards

• section 242(1B) for NHS trusts and NHS foundation trusts

A duty for commissioners to promote involvement of each patient is required under s.14Z36.

A requirement to involve the public is also included as a service condition in the NHS Standard Contract for providers.

In line with these legal duties, NHS commissioning organisations are required to publish an annual assessment of how well they are meeting this duty as part statutory annual reporting.

NHS England is required to carry out an annual assessment setting out how well the ICB has performed on its statutory duties, including how the ICB has promoted patient and public involvement and choice. Assessments can be viewed via individual ICB websites.

Section 8 of The Health Act 2009 describes that healthcare providers are additionally required to provide a detailed statement about the quality of their services as part of their Quality Account. The quality of the services is measured by looking at: - patient safety - how effective patient treatments are - patient feedback about care provided.

CQC and NHS England publish patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care under their National Patient Survey Programme. Examples include the Cancer Patient Experience survey and the GP Patient Survey.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – Ongoing”. Table row: section 6.2 No. 31, PDF page 85.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

The Government agreed with this recommendation.

In its January 2002 response, the Department of Health said that from 2002/3, every trust should publish a new Patient Prospectus, including an annual account of patients’ views and local standards set specifically to address shortfalls identified through the patient survey.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 6.2 No. 31, PDF page 82.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.