BRIS-19

Require effective communication among healthcare professionals to avoid conflicting patient advice

Bristol Heart Inquiry · Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 18 July 2001

Government responseNot tracked (historical inquiry)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Healthcare professionals responsible for the care of any particular patient must communicate effectively with each other. The aim must be to avoid giving the patient conflicting advice and information.

Bristol Heart Inquiry, Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · 18 Jul 2001 Source PDF →

Government response

●No formal government response recorded

The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

Please see our responses to Recommendations 1 (patient centred care), 2 (shared decision-making) and 50 (leadership).

The NHS Constitution sets out the six core NHS values. These include commitment to quality of care and working together for patients. These values are set at the highest level by the Department of Health and Social Care through the NHS Constitution and the Government’s Mandate to NHS England.

Effective communication is a vital component in providing quality care in health. Good communication skills within and between teams benefits patients, but also those working as part of the team, helping reduce risks and providing support for staff. Understanding individual communication styles and how they impact on team function is crucial for the development of positive team attributes and the reduction and management of conflict. There are several tools which have been developed to assist this:

• The NHS Long Term workforce plan, which contains a specific focus on optimising multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs).

• Guidance on information sharing in MDTs, developed by NHS England, the Information Commissioners Office and the National Data Guardian.

• Professional regulators, such as:

o GMC guidance on Decision Making and Consent, which provides advice on wider team involvement but also the delegation of decision making.

o The GMC provide guidance on working with colleagues, outlining how respect and good communication is essential for good and safe patient care.

• Working differently together, a toolkit developed by HEE (now part of NHS England) , provides a step-by-step guide to help progress a ‘one workforce’ approach across health and care organisations and ICSs. ‘One workforce’ is intended to be indicative of a workforce drawn from a range of health and social care disciplines, working seamlessly as a productive, multifunctional team across clinical pathways.

The CQC considers the effectiveness of MDT working when it assesses services. In its previous inspection approach, prompts about MDT working were added to the relevant inspection framework. CQC have now implemented and started assessing against the Single Assessment Framework (SAF). MDT working is assessed under the Effective Quality Statement for how staff, teams and services work together.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – Ongoing”. Table row: section 6.2 No. 19, PDF page 78-79.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

The Government agreed with this recommendation.

In its January 2002 response, the Department of Health said that its communications initiative would ensure patients were at the focus of team working and inter-professional care, with healthcare professionals developing these skills through joint learning.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 6.2 No. 19, PDF page 79.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.