BRIS-17

Ensure patients receive copies of all inter-professional letters about their care

Bristol Heart Inquiry · Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 18 July 2001

Government responseNot tracked (historical inquiry)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Patients should receive a copy of any letter written about their care or treatment by one healthcare professional to another.

Bristol Heart Inquiry, Bristol Heart Inquiry — Final Report · 18 Jul 2001 Source PDF →

Government response

●No formal government response recorded

The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

The Thirlwall Inquiry has noted action taken in response to this recommendation.

This is implemented and reinforced though:

• The Professional Record Standard’s Body (PRSB) Outpatient Letter Standard (2023) and supporting guidance

• Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) guidance (2018), which requires letters should be written directly to patients, copying their GP (and provides a template) The AoMRC’s guidance is also reflected in NICE guidance on shared decision-making.

• The NHS Standard Contract, which states that outpatient letters should be consistent with PRSB’s standards.

• The Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) Order, which requires that private healthcare providers must send letters to patients prior to consultations or further tests and treatments setting out the costs, reasons and other relevant information regarding the procedure.

• The GMC updated its Good Medical Practice guidance to include communicating effectively with patients. This came into effect in January 2024.

In December 2021, the AoMRC, PRSB and NHS Employers wrote to their members to remind them of best practice when writing to patients, referring to AoMRC’s guidance.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented – Ongoing .”. Table row: section 6.2 No. 17, PDF page 77.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

The Government agreed with this recommendation. In its January 2002 response, the Department of Health said that a working group including patients, doctors, nurses, hospital records management staff and representatives of professional organisations was set up in July 2001 to produce guidelines on copying clinicians’ letters to patients and set out arrangements for parents to receive copies of letters, with the working group to produce its guidelines by summer 2002.

Good practice guidelines were published in April 2003, providing a general rule that, where patients agree, letters written by one health professional to another about a patient should be copied to the patient, or where appropriate a parent.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review colours its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green, which it uses to mark evidence, identified by the legal team, that a recommendation has been clearly implemented. Table row: section 6.2 No. 17, PDF page 77-78.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.